Wananukul Siriwan, Chatchatee Pantipa, Chatproedprai Sucheera
Division of Pediatric Dermatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2005 Dec;23(4):175-9.
We conducted a prospective study at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, from June 2001 to November 2003, to identify the contribution of food allergy to urticaria in children. During the study period, 100 children with urticaria were enrolled, 36 of whom had a history suspicious of food allergy. Fifteen of 100 patients had fever (9 from upper respiratory tract infections, 4 from diarrhea and 2 from skin infections). A skin prick test (SPT) was positive in 15 of the 36 children who were suspected of having food allergy; 5 patients out of the positive SPT group had anaphylaxis due to food (2 from cow milk, 2 from wheat and 1 from egg). Six patients in the positive SPT group had a negative food challenge test (4 from open challenges and 2 from double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges [DBPCFC]). The other 4 patients of the positive SPT group refused the food challenge test. The parents of a patient who had urticaria from egg refused the skin prick test; an oral challenge test confirmed the diagnosis of egg allergy. One of the 21 patients that had a negative SPT had shrimp allergy proven by DBPCFC. Of the 64 patients who had no history related to food, SPT was done in 27 patients and revealed a positive result in 7 patients, all of whom had a negative food challenge test (4 with open challenge and 3 with DBPCFC). Urticaria from food was found in 7% and was suspected in another 4% of the patients. Severe reactions to food like anaphylaxis may occur. SPT alone is not adequate in making the diagnosis of food allergy; it must be confirmed by a food challenge test. Thirty percent of patients that did not have a history related to food had false positive SPT. Without a history suspicious of food allergy, SPT yields only minimal benefit.
2001年6月至2003年11月,我们在朱拉隆功国王纪念医院进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定食物过敏对儿童荨麻疹的影响。研究期间,招募了100名患有荨麻疹的儿童,其中36名有可疑食物过敏史。100名患者中有15名发热(9名因上呼吸道感染,4名因腹泻,2名因皮肤感染)。36名疑似食物过敏的儿童中,15名皮肤点刺试验(SPT)呈阳性;SPT阳性组中有5名患者因食物发生过敏反应(2名对牛奶过敏,2名对小麦过敏,1名对鸡蛋过敏)。SPT阳性组中有6名患者食物激发试验结果为阴性(4名进行开放性激发试验,2名进行双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验[DBPCFC])。SPT阳性组的其他4名患者拒绝食物激发试验。一名对鸡蛋过敏而患荨麻疹的患者的父母拒绝皮肤点刺试验;口服激发试验确诊为鸡蛋过敏。21名SPT阴性的患者中,有1名经DBPCFC证实对虾过敏。64名无食物相关病史的患者中,27名进行了SPT,7名结果呈阳性,所有这些患者食物激发试验结果均为阴性(4名进行开放性激发试验,3名进行DBPCFC)。7%的患者发现食物引起荨麻疹,另有4%的患者疑似食物引起荨麻疹。可能会发生如过敏反应等严重的食物不良反应。仅靠SPT不足以诊断食物过敏;必须通过食物激发试验来确诊。30%无食物相关病史的患者SPT结果为假阳性。没有可疑食物过敏史时,SPT的益处极小。