Masuda Jeffrey R, Garvin Theresa
School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Risk Anal. 2006 Apr;26(2):437-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00749.x.
This article investigates the role of culture in the social production of risks and risk communication surrounding industrial development in a region located at a rural-urban interface. A case study examined a public consultation that was undertaken to inform local residents about an eco-industrial development proposal being planned near Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The research employed the social amplification of risk framework (SARF) to examine the relationships among culture, place, and socially constructed risk. A total of 44 in-depth, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 33 landowners (farmers, acreage owners), public officials (municipal politicians, administrators), journalists, and industry representatives. Analysis revealed that risk communication occurred in relation to situated experiences of place that were based on conflicting cultural worldviews. The research shows that place is a useful component of the SARF, providing a spatial explanation for why some people amplify, and others attenuate, risks in locally contentious environmental debates.
本文探讨了文化在位于城乡交界处的一个地区围绕工业发展的风险社会生产及风险沟通中所起的作用。一项案例研究考察了一次公众咨询活动,该活动旨在让当地居民了解加拿大艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿市附近正在规划的一个生态工业发展提案。该研究采用风险社会放大框架(SARF)来考察文化、地点与社会建构风险之间的关系。研究人员共对33名土地所有者(农民、大面积土地所有者)、政府官员(市议员、行政人员)、记者和行业代表进行了44次深入的半结构化访谈。分析表明,风险沟通是围绕基于相互冲突的文化世界观的特定地点体验展开的。研究表明,地点是风险社会放大框架中的一个有用组成部分,它为在当地有争议的环境辩论中为何有些人放大风险而有些人则降低风险提供了一个空间解释。