Britt Thomas W, Garrity Michael J
Department of Psychology, Clemson University, SC 29634, USA.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;45(Pt 1):127-47. doi: 10.1348/014466605X41355.
This study examined the ability of attributions and personality traits to predict the emotional and behavioural components of the road rage response. Participants recalled a recent time when they experienced three different anger-provoking events when driving. They then rated their behaviours and emotions during the event, and their attributions for why the event occurred. Participants also completed a battery of personality questionnaires designed to predict their responses to the situations. Attributing causality for the anger-arousing event to a stable factor in the offending driver was uniquely related to aggressive behaviour and anger in all three situations. Hostile and blame attributions predicted aggressive behaviour and anger in different situations. In addition to dispositional measures of aggressiveness and anger predicting aggressive behaviour and anger in each of the anger-provoking situations, other personality variables were also related to aspects of the road rage response (e.g. conscientiousness, agreeableness, narcissism, and extraversion). Attributions and personality traits accounted for unique variance in the outcomes, and there were only sporadic effects of attributions partially mediating the relationships between personality variables and responses to the anger-provoking situations. Therefore, it is unlikely that the relationships between personality traits and responses to anger-provoking situations are completely mediated by attributional processing.
本研究考察了归因和人格特质对路怒反应中情绪和行为成分的预测能力。参与者回忆了最近一次开车时经历的三次不同的激怒事件。然后,他们对事件中的行为和情绪,以及事件发生原因的归因进行了评分。参与者还完成了一系列旨在预测其对这些情况反应的人格问卷。将引发愤怒事件的因果关系归因于冒犯司机的稳定因素,在所有三种情况下都与攻击行为和愤怒有着独特的关联。敌意和责备归因在不同情况下预测攻击行为和愤怒。除了攻击性和愤怒的倾向性测量在每种激怒情况下预测攻击行为和愤怒外,其他人格变量也与路怒反应的各个方面有关(例如尽责性、宜人性、自恋和外向性)。归因和人格特质在结果中解释了独特的方差,并且只有零星的归因效应部分中介了人格变量与对激怒情况反应之间的关系。因此,人格特质与对激怒情况反应之间的关系不太可能完全由归因过程介导。