Marín Puchades Víctor, Prati Gabriele, Rondinella Gianni, De Angelis Marco, Fassina Filippo, Fraboni Federico, Pietrantoni Luca
Human Factors, Risk and Safety, Department of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 15;8:2203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02203. eCollection 2017.
Road anger constitutes one of the determinant factors related to safety outcomes (e.g., accidents, near misses). Although cyclists are considered vulnerable road users due to their relatively high rate of fatalities in traffic, previous research has solely focused on car drivers, and no study has yet investigated the effect of anger on cyclists' safety outcomes. The present research aims to investigate, for the first time, the effects of cycling anger toward different types of road users on near misses involving such road users and near misses in general. Using a daily diary web-based questionnaire, we collected data about daily trips, bicycle use, near misses experienced, cyclist's anger and demographic information from 254 Spanish cyclists. Poisson regression was used to assess the association of cycling anger with near misses, which is a count variable. No relationship was found between general cycling anger and near misses occurrence. Anger toward specific road users had different effects on the probability of near misses with different road users. Anger toward the interaction with car drivers increased the probability of near misses involving cyclists and pedestrians. Anger toward interaction with pedestrians was associated with higher probability of near misses with pedestrians. Anger toward cyclists exerted no effect on the probability of near misses with any road user (i.e., car drivers, cyclists or pedestrians), whereas anger toward the interactions with the police had a diminishing effect on the occurrence of near misses' involving all types of road users. The present study demonstrated that the effect of road anger on safety outcomes among cyclists is different from that of motorists. Moreover, the target of anger played an important role on safety both for the cyclist and the specific road users. Possible explanations for these differences are based on the difference in status and power with motorists, as well as on the potential displaced aggression produced by the fear of retaliation by motorized vehicle users.
路怒是与安全结果(如事故、险些相撞)相关的决定性因素之一。尽管由于骑自行车的人在交通中死亡率相对较高,被视为道路弱势群体,但以往的研究仅关注汽车司机,尚无研究调查愤怒对骑自行车者安全结果的影响。本研究旨在首次调查骑自行车时对不同类型道路使用者的愤怒情绪对涉及此类道路使用者的险些相撞事件以及总体险些相撞事件的影响。我们通过基于网络的每日日记问卷,收集了254名西班牙骑自行车者的日常出行、自行车使用情况、经历的险些相撞事件、骑车人的愤怒情绪以及人口统计信息。使用泊松回归来评估骑车愤怒情绪与险些相撞事件(这是一个计数变量)之间的关联。未发现总体骑车愤怒情绪与险些相撞事件的发生之间存在关联。对特定道路使用者的愤怒情绪对与不同道路使用者发生险些相撞事件的概率有不同影响。对与汽车司机互动的愤怒情绪增加了涉及骑自行车者和行人的险些相撞事件的概率。对与行人互动的愤怒情绪与与行人发生险些相撞事件的较高概率相关。对骑自行车者的愤怒情绪对与任何道路使用者(即汽车司机、骑自行车者或行人)发生险些相撞事件的概率没有影响,而对与警察互动的愤怒情绪对涉及所有类型道路使用者的险些相撞事件的发生有递减影响。本研究表明路怒对骑自行车者安全结果的影响与对驾车者的影响不同。此外,愤怒的对象对骑自行车者和特定道路使用者的安全都起着重要作用。这些差异的可能解释基于与驾车者在地位和权力上的差异,以及因担心机动车使用者报复而产生的潜在替代性攻击。