了解一切事物的价值——对B·比约克曼和S·O·汉松的《身体权利与财产权》的批判性评论
To know the value of everything--a critical commentary on B Björkman and S O Hansson's "Bodily rights and property rights".
作者信息
Karlsen J R, de Faria P L, Solbakk J H
机构信息
Section for Medical Ethics, Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Frederik Holsts Hus, Ullevål terasse, PO Box 1130 Blindern, No-0318 Oslo, Norway.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):215-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012021.
Abstract
Though the authors of this commentary have deep felt doubts about the fruitfulness of Björkman and Hansson's analysis of bodily rights, they do not doubt their capacity to develop both creative and provocative thoughts
摘要
尽管这篇评论的作者对比约克曼和汉松关于身体权利的分析是否富有成效深感怀疑，但他们并不怀疑他们提出创造性和启发性想法的能力。
相似文献
1
To know the value of everything--a critical commentary on B Björkman and S O Hansson's "Bodily rights and property rights".了解一切事物的价值——对B·比约克曼和S·O·汉松的《身体权利与财产权》的批判性评论
J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):215-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012021.
2
Bodily rights and property rights.身体权和财产权。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Apr;32(4):209-14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.011270.
3
Commodification and privacy: a Lockean perspective.
HEC Forum. 2010 Sep;22(3):179-95. doi: 10.1007/s10730-010-9136-3.
4
5
Property, privacy, and the human body.
Boston Univ Law Rev. 2000 Apr;80(2):359-460.
6
Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries.与人体组织相关的发明：发展中国家国际合作研究中的所有权与知识产权
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):171-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019612.
7
For your first born child: an ethical defense of the exploitation argument against commercial surrogacy.对于你的第一个孩子：对反对商业代孕的剥削论点的伦理辩护。
Penn Bioeth J. 2006 Spring;2(2):42-5.
8
An interest in human dignity as the basis for genomic torts.对将人类尊严作为基因侵权行为基础的关注。
Washburn Law J. 2003 Spring;42(3):413-81.
9
Consent, commodification and benefit-sharing in genetic research.基因研究中的知情同意、商品化与利益分享。
Dev World Bioeth. 2004 Dec;4(2):109-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8731.2004.00087.x.
10
Disentangling privacy from property: toward a deeper understanding of genetic privacy.区分隐私与财产：迈向对基因隐私的更深入理解
George Washington Law Rev. 2004 Apr;72(4):737-814.
引用本文的文献
1
Different but Same: A Call for a Joint Pro-Active Regulation of Cross-Border Egg and Surrogacy Markets.不同却又相同：呼吁对跨境卵子和代孕市场进行联合积极监管。
Health Matrix Clevel. 2018;28(1):323-374.
2
Development and progress of Ireland's biobank network: Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI), standardized documentation, sample and data release, and international perspective.爱尔兰生物样本库网络的发展与进步：伦理、法律及社会影响（ELSI）、标准化文件编制、样本与数据发布以及国际视角
Biopreserv Biobank. 2013 Feb;11(1):3-11. doi: 10.1089/bio.2012.0028.
Zotero 插件