Suppr超能文献

舒张期充盈的负荷独立指数:基于模型的推导及在对照和舒张功能障碍受试者中的体内验证

Load-independent index of diastolic filling: model-based derivation with in vivo validation in control and diastolic dysfunction subjects.

作者信息

Shmuylovich Leonid, Kovács Sándor J

机构信息

Cardiovascular Biophysics Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Jul;101(1):92-101. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01305.2005. Epub 2006 Mar 30.

Abstract

Maximum elastance is an experimentally validated, load-independent systolic function index stemming from the time-varying elastance paradigm that decoupled extrinsic load from (intrinsic) contractility. Although Doppler echocardiography is the preferred method of diastolic function (DF) assessment, all echo-derived indexes are load dependent, and no invasive or noninvasive load-independent index of filling (LIIF) exists. In this study, we derived and experimentally validated a LIIF. We used a kinematic filling paradigm (the parameterized diastolic filling formalism) to predict and derive the (dimensionless) dynamic diastolic efficiency M, defined by the slope of the peak driving force [maximum driving force (kx(o)) proportional, variant peak atrioventricular (AV) gradient] to maximum viscoelastic resistive force [peak resistive force (cE(peak))] relation. To validate load independence, we analyzed E-waves recorded while load was varied via tilt table (head up, horizontal, and head down) in 16 healthy volunteers. For the group, linear regression of E-wave derived kx(o) vs. cE(peak) yielded kx(o) = M (cE(peak)) + B, r2 = 0.98; where M = 1.27 +/- 0.09 and B = 5.69 +/- 1.70. Effects of diastolic dysfunction (DD) on M were assessed by analysis of preexisting simultaneous cath-echo data in six DD vs. five control subjects. Average M for the DD group (M = 0.98 +/- 0.07) was significantly lower than controls (M = 1.17 +/- 0.05, P < 0.001). We conclude that M is a LIIF because it uncouples intrinsic DF (i.e., the pressure-flow relation) from extrinsic load (left ventricular end-diastolic pressure). Larger M values imply better DF in that increasing AV pressure gradient results in relatively smaller increases in peak resistive losses (cE(peak)). Conversely, lower M implies that increasing AV gradient leads to larger increases in resistive losses. Further prospective validation characterizing M in well-defined pathological states is warranted.

摘要

最大弹性是一种经过实验验证的、与负荷无关的收缩功能指标,它源于时变弹性范式,该范式将外在负荷与(内在)收缩性分离开来。虽然多普勒超声心动图是评估舒张功能(DF)的首选方法,但所有基于超声心动图得出的指标都依赖于负荷,并且不存在侵入性或非侵入性的与负荷无关的充盈指标(LIIF)。在本研究中,我们推导并通过实验验证了一种LIIF。我们使用运动学充盈范式(参数化舒张充盈形式)来预测和推导(无量纲的)动态舒张效率M,其定义为峰值驱动力[最大驱动力(kx(o)),与峰值房室(AV)梯度成正比且变化]与最大粘弹性阻力[峰值阻力(cE(peak))]关系的斜率。为了验证与负荷无关性,我们分析了16名健康志愿者在通过倾斜台改变负荷(头高位、水平位和头低位)时记录的E波。对于该组,E波得出的kx(o)与cE(peak)的线性回归得出kx(o)=M(cE(peak))+B,r2 = 0.98;其中M = 1.27±0.09且B = 5.69±1.70。通过分析6名舒张功能障碍(DD)患者与5名对照受试者预先存在的同步心导管 - 超声心动图数据,评估了舒张功能障碍对M的影响。DD组的平均M值(M = 0.98±0.07)显著低于对照组(M = 1.17±0.05,P < 0.001)。我们得出结论,M是一种LIIF,因为它将内在舒张功能(即压力 - 流量关系)与外在负荷(左心室舒张末期压力)分离开来。较大的M值意味着更好的舒张功能,因为增加的房室压力梯度导致峰值阻力损失(cE(peak))的增加相对较小。相反,较低的M意味着增加的房室梯度会导致阻力损失的更大增加。有必要在明确界定的病理状态下对M进行进一步的前瞻性验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验