Garrouste-Orgeas Maite, Timsit Jean Francois, Tafflet Muriel, Misset Benoit, Zahar Jean-Ralph, Soufir Lilia, Lazard Thierry, Jamali Samir, Mourvillier Bruno, Cohen Yves, De Lassence Arnaud, Azoulay Elie, Cheval Christine, Descorps-Declere Adrien, Adrie Christophe, Costa de Beauregard Marie-Alliette, Carlet Jean
Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France [corrected]
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 15;42(8):1118-26. doi: 10.1086/500318. Epub 2006 Mar 14.
Overall rates of bloodstream infection (BSI) are often used as quality indicators in intensive care units (ICUs). We investigated whether ICU-acquired BSI increased mortality (by > or = 10%) after adjustment for severity of infection at ICU admission and during the pre-BSI stay.
We conducted a matched, risk-adjusted (1:n), exposed-unexposed study of patients with stays longer than 72 h in 12 ICUs randomly selected from the Outcomerea database.
Patients with BSI after the third ICU day (exposed group) were matched on the basis of risk-exposure time and mortality predicted at admission using the Three-Day Recalibrated ICU Outcome (TRIO) score to patients without BSI (unexposed group). Severity was assessed daily using the Logistic Organ Dysfunction (LOD) score. Of 3247 patients with ICU stays of >3 days, 232 experienced BSI by day 30 (incidence, 6.8 cases per 100 admissions); among them, 226 patients were matched to 1023 unexposed patients. Crude hospital mortality was 61.5% among exposed and 36.7% among unexposed patients (P<.0001). Attributable mortality was 24.8%. The only variable associated with both BSI and hospital mortality was the LOD score determined 4 days before onset of BSI (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.16; P = .0025). The adjusted OR for hospital mortality among exposed patients (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.30-4.43) decreased when the LOD score determined 4 days before onset of BSI was taken into account (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.17-4.22; P<.0001). The estimated risk of death from BSI varied considerably according to the source and resistance of organisms, time to onset, and appropriateness of treatment.
When adjusted for risk-exposure time and severity at admission and during the ICU stay, BSI was associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality, but considerable variation occurred across BSI subgroups. Focusing on BSI subgroups may be valuable for assessing quality of care in ICUs.
血流感染(BSI)的总体发生率常被用作重症监护病房(ICU)的质量指标。我们研究了在对ICU入院时及BSI发生前住院期间的感染严重程度进行校正后,ICU获得性BSI是否会增加死亡率(增加≥10%)。
我们对从Outcomerea数据库中随机选取的12个ICU中住院时间超过72小时的患者进行了一项匹配的、风险校正(1:n)的暴露-非暴露研究。
将第三天后发生BSI的患者(暴露组)根据风险暴露时间和入院时使用三日重新校准ICU结局(TRIO)评分预测的死亡率,与未发生BSI的患者(非暴露组)进行匹配。每天使用逻辑器官功能障碍(LOD)评分评估严重程度。在3247例ICU住院超过3天的患者中,232例在第30天前发生了BSI(发生率为每100例入院患者中有6.8例);其中,226例患者与1023例非暴露患者进行了匹配。暴露组患者的粗住院死亡率为61.5%,非暴露组为36.7%(P<0.0001)。归因死亡率为24.8%。与BSI和医院死亡率均相关的唯一变量是BSI发病前4天确定的LOD评分(比值比[OR]为1.10;95%置信区间[CI]为1.03 - 1.16;P = 0.0025)。当考虑BSI发病前4天确定的LOD评分时,暴露组患者医院死亡率的校正OR(OR为3.20;95%CI为2.30 - 4.43)降低(OR为3.02;95%CI为2.17 - 4.22;P<0.0001)。根据病原体的来源和耐药性、发病时间以及治疗的恰当性,BSI导致的估计死亡风险差异很大。
在对风险暴露时间以及入院时和ICU住院期间的严重程度进行校正后,BSI与死亡率增加3倍相关,但不同BSI亚组之间存在相当大的差异。关注BSI亚组对于评估ICU的医疗质量可能有价值。