• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院出院数据中产科诊断和程序的准确性。

Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data.

作者信息

Yasmeen Shagufta, Romano Patrick S, Schembri Michael E, Keyzer Janet M, Gilbert William M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058
PMID:16580288
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to estimate the validity of obstetric procedures and diagnoses in California patient discharge data.

STUDY DESIGN

We randomly sampled 1611 deliveries from 52 of 267 California hospitals that performed more than 678 eligible deliveries in 1992 to 1993. We compared hospital-reported procedures and diagnoses against our recoding of the same records.

RESULTS

Cesarean, forceps, and vacuum delivery were accurately reported, with sensitivities and positive predictive values exceeding 90%. Episiotomy was underreported (70% sensitivity). Cesarean indications were reported with at least 60% sensitivity, except uterine inertia, herpes, and long labor. Among comorbidities, sensitivity exceeded 60% for chorioamnionitis, diabetes, premature labor, preeclampsia, and intrauterine death. Sensitivity was poor (less than 60%) for anemia, asthma, thyroid disorders, mental disorders, drug abuse, genitourinary infections, obesity, fibroids, excessive fetal growth, hypertension, premature rupture, polyhydramnios, and postdates.

CONCLUSION

The validity of hospital-reported obstetric procedures and diagnoses varies, with moderate to high accuracy for some codes but poor accuracy for others.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估加利福尼亚州患者出院数据中产科手术和诊断的有效性。

研究设计

我们从1992年至1993年进行了超过678例符合条件分娩的267家加利福尼亚医院中的52家随机抽取了1611例分娩病例。我们将医院报告的手术和诊断与我们对相同记录的重新编码进行了比较。

结果

剖宫产、产钳助产和真空吸引分娩报告准确,敏感性和阳性预测值超过90%。会阴切开术报告不足(敏感性70%)。剖宫产指征报告的敏感性至少为60%,但子宫收缩乏力、疱疹和产程延长除外。在合并症中,绒毛膜羊膜炎、糖尿病、早产、先兆子痫和宫内死亡的敏感性超过60%。贫血、哮喘、甲状腺疾病、精神疾病、药物滥用、泌尿生殖系统感染、肥胖、子宫肌瘤、胎儿过度生长、高血压、胎膜早破、羊水过多和过期妊娠的敏感性较差(低于60%)。

结论

医院报告的产科手术和诊断的有效性各不相同,某些编码的准确性中等至高,但其他编码的准确性较差。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data.医院出院数据中产科诊断和程序的准确性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058.
2
Coding of perineal lacerations and other complications of obstetric care in hospital discharge data.住院出院数据中会阴裂伤及其他产科护理并发症的编码
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;106(4):717-25. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000179552.36108.6d.
3
Accuracy of reporting maternal in-hospital diagnoses and intrapartum procedures in Washington State linked birth records.华盛顿州关联出生记录中孕产妇住院诊断和分娩期程序报告的准确性。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;19(6):460-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00682.x.
4
How accurate is the reporting of obstetric haemorrhage in hospital discharge data? A validation study.医院出院数据中产科出血报告的准确性如何?一项验证研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;48(5):481-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00910.x.
5
Hospital discharge data can be used for monitoring procedures and intensive care related to severe maternal morbidity.医院出院数据可用于监测严重产妇发病率相关的程序和重症监护。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):1014-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.015. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
6
U.S. trends in obstetric procedures, 1990-2000.1990 - 2000年美国产科手术趋势。
Birth. 2002 Sep;29(3):157-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2002.00182.x.
7
The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data.出生证明和医院出院数据中关于孕产妇既往病史及妊娠并发症的报告。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.096.
8
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.39周选择性剖宫产:对肩难产、胎儿创伤、新生儿脑病及胎儿宫内死亡的影响
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009.
9
Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records.与医疗记录相比,印第安纳州出生证明数据的可靠性。
Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Jan;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.03.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
10
Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?医疗保健研究与质量局的产科创伤指标是衡量医院安全性的有效指标吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;195(3):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Are racial and ethnic disparities in brachial plexus birth injuries explained by known risk factors?臂丛神经产伤中的种族和民族差异可以用已知的风险因素来解释吗?
J Perinatol. 2025 Mar 15. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02239-8.
2
Identification of Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy in Three Administrative Data Sources Among Medicaid-Funded Births in California.加利福尼亚州医疗补助资助分娩的三个行政数据源中孕期慢性高血压的识别
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Dec;33(12):e70059. doi: 10.1002/pds.70059.
3
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Insufficiency, Cervical Cerclage, and Preterm Birth.
宫颈机能不全、宫颈环扎术和早产方面的种族与民族差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jan;34(1):70-77. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0088. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
4
Hypertension in Pregnancy: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for Surveillance and Research.妊娠期高血压:监测和研究的当前挑战与未来机遇。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 May;33(5):553-562. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.1072. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
5
Association of Parity and Previous Birth Outcome With Brachial Plexus Birth Injury Risk.产次和既往分娩结局与臂丛神经出生损伤风险的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov 1;142(5):1217-1225. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005394. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Systematic review of validated case definitions to identify hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in administrative healthcare databases.系统评价验证后的病例定义以识别行政医疗保健数据库中的妊娠高血压疾病。
Open Heart. 2023 Aug;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002151.
7
Pregnancy-related thromboembolism in women with sickle cell disease: An analysis of National Medicaid Data.妊娠相关血栓栓塞症在镰状细胞病女性中的分析:国家医疗补助数据研究。
Am J Hematol. 2023 Nov;98(11):1677-1684. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27045. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
8
Evaluation of Cesarean Rates for Term, Singleton, Live Vertex Deliveries in China in 2020 Among Women With No Prior Cesarean Delivery.2020 年中国无剖宫产史的足月、单胎、头位活产产妇的剖宫产率评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234521. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4521.
9
Linked birth cohort files for perinatal health research: California as a model for methodology and implementation.围产期健康研究的链接出生队列文件:以加利福尼亚为例的方法学和实施模型。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;79:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
10
Validation of claims-based algorithms to identify non-live birth outcomes.基于申报算法验证非活产结局的识别。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Apr;32(4):468-474. doi: 10.1002/pds.5574. Epub 2022 Nov 30.