Mali P, Deshpande Shobha, Singh A
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.L.E.S.'s Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Mar;24(1):15-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.22828.
The present study was conducted with the aim of evaluating and comparing the microleakage of glass ionomer, composite resin and compomers. Class V cavities were made in thirty intact caries free premolars and restored with restorative materials to be tested respectively. The teeth were thermocycled and subjected to silver nitrate dye penetration. They were subsequently sectioned buccolingually. Microleakage was evaluated under a stereomicroscope and data subjected to statistical analysis. The study concluded that microleakage was evident in all restorative materials, with glass ionomer showing maximum leakage followed by composite resin. Compomer demonstrated the best results with minimum leakage.
本研究旨在评估和比较玻璃离子水门汀、复合树脂和聚酸改性复合树脂的微渗漏情况。在30颗完整无龋的前磨牙上制备V类洞型,分别用待测试的修复材料进行修复。对牙齿进行热循环处理,然后进行硝酸银染料渗透试验。随后将牙齿沿颊舌方向切片。在体视显微镜下评估微渗漏情况,并对数据进行统计分析。研究得出结论,所有修复材料均存在明显的微渗漏,其中玻璃离子水门汀的渗漏最大,其次是复合树脂。聚酸改性复合树脂的微渗漏最少,效果最佳。