Mozaffari Hamid Reza, Ehteshami Alireza, Zallaghi Farshad, Chiniforush Nasim, Moradi Zohreh
Oral Medicine Department, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
Dentist, Private Practice.
Laser Ther. 2016 Dec 30;25(4):259-266. doi: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-20.
Glutaraldehyde, CO and Er:YAG lasers can be used for treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. However, their application may have adverse effects on the clinical service of restorations. This study aimed to assess the microleakage in composite restorations following surface treatment with Glutaraldehyde desensitizer, CO and Er:YAG laser irradiation for treatment of dentin hypersensitivity. This experimental study was conducted on 60 extracted sound human teeth. Class V cavities were prepared measuring 3×3 mm using a diamond bur. Specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups of 15. Group one:no surface treatment, Group two:applying Glutaraldehyde desensitizer, Groups of three and four were irradiated with CO and Er:YAG lasers, respectively. Surfaces were restored with bonding agent (Single Bond 2, 3M, USA) and Z250 composite (3M, USA). Specimens were thermocycled and immersed in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. Microleakage scores were assessed under a stereomicroscope at ×20 magnification. Data were analyzed using SPSS and the Kruskal Wallis test (P=0.05). There was no significant difference between microleakage of groups in enamel margins (P=0.694). The difference in microleakage at the dentin margin was significant between groups (P=0.018). Application of Glutaraldehyde-desensitizer and CO laser irradiation of surfaces prior to composite restoration do not increase microleakage at the enamel or dentin margins but tooth surface treatment with Er:YAG laser significantly increased the microleakage at the dentin margins.
戊二醛、一氧化碳和铒:钇铝石榴石激光可用于治疗牙本质过敏症。然而,它们的应用可能会对修复体的临床服务产生不利影响。本研究旨在评估用戊二醛脱敏剂、一氧化碳和铒:钇铝石榴石激光照射治疗牙本质过敏症后复合树脂修复体的微渗漏情况。本实验研究选取了60颗拔除的健康人牙进行。使用金刚砂车针制备3×3毫米的V类洞。样本随机分为4组,每组15颗牙。第一组:不进行表面处理;第二组:应用戊二醛脱敏剂;第三组和第四组分别用一氧化碳和铒:钇铝石榴石激光照射。用粘结剂(美国3M公司的Single Bond 2)和Z250复合树脂(美国3M公司)修复表面。对样本进行热循环处理,并浸泡在1%的亚甲蓝溶液中24小时。在20倍放大倍数的体视显微镜下评估微渗漏评分。使用SPSS软件和Kruskal Wallis检验(P = 0.05)对数据进行分析。釉质边缘各组的微渗漏情况无显著差异(P = 0.694)。牙本质边缘各组的微渗漏差异有统计学意义(P = 0.018)。在复合树脂修复前应用戊二醛脱敏剂和一氧化碳激光照射表面不会增加釉质或牙本质边缘的微渗漏,但用铒:钇铝石榴石激光对牙齿表面进行处理会显著增加牙本质边缘的微渗漏。