Orsière T, Sari-Minodier I, Iarmarcovai G, Botta A
Laboratoire de Biogénotoxicologie et Mutagenèse Environnementale (EA 1784-IFR PMSE 112), Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditerranée, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Mutat Res. 2006 Jun 16;605(1-2):30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Apr 3.
A study was conducted to evaluate the genotoxic effect of occupational exposure to formaldehyde on pathology and anatomy laboratory workers. The level of exposure to formaldehyde was determined by use of passive air-monitoring badges clipped near the breathing zone of 59 workers for a total sampling time of 15 min or 8 h. To estimate DNA damage, a chemiluminescence microplate assay was performed on 57 workers before and after a 1-day exposure. Assessment of chromosomal damage was carried out by use of the cytokinesis-blocked micronucleus assay (CBMN) in peripheral lymphocytes of 59 exposed subjects in comparison with 37 controls matched for gender, age, and smoking habits. The CBMN assay was combined with fluorescent in situ hybridization with a pan-centromeric DNA probe in 18 exposed subjects and 18 control subjects randomized from the initial populations. Mean concentrations of formaldehyde were 2.0 (range <0.1-20.4 ppm) and 0.1 ppm (range <0.1-0.7 ppm) for the sampling times of 15 min and 8 h, respectively. No increase in DNA damage was detected in lymphocytes after a one-workday exposure. However, the frequency of binucleated micronucleated cells was significantly higher in pathologists/anatomists than in controls (16.9‰±9.3 versus 11.1‰±6.0, P=0.001). The frequency of centromeric micronuclei was higher in exposed subjects than in controls (17.3‰±11.5 versus 10.3‰±7.1) but the difference was not significant. The frequency of monocentromeric micronuclei was significantly higher in exposed subjects than in controls (11.0‰±6.2 versus 3.1‰±2.4, P<0.001), while that of the acentromeric micronuclei was similar in exposed subjects and controls (3.7‰±4.2 and 4.1‰±2.7, respectively). The enhanced chromosomal damage (particularly chromosome loss) in peripheral lymphocytes of pathologists/anatomists emphasizes the need to develop safety programs.
一项研究旨在评估职业接触甲醛对病理学和解剖学实验室工作人员的遗传毒性作用。通过将被动式空气监测徽章夹在59名工作人员呼吸区附近来确定甲醛暴露水平,总采样时间为15分钟或8小时。为了估计DNA损伤,在1天暴露前后对57名工作人员进行了化学发光微孔板测定。通过胞质分裂阻滞微核试验(CBMN)对59名暴露受试者的外周淋巴细胞进行染色体损伤评估,并与37名性别、年龄和吸烟习惯相匹配的对照进行比较。在18名暴露受试者和18名从初始人群中随机抽取的对照受试者中,CBMN试验与使用全着丝粒DNA探针的荧光原位杂交相结合。15分钟和8小时采样时间的甲醛平均浓度分别为2.0(范围<0.1 - 20.4 ppm)和0.1 ppm(范围<0.1 - 0.7 ppm)。在一个工作日的暴露后,未在淋巴细胞中检测到DNA损伤增加。然而,病理学家/解剖学家中双核微核细胞的频率显著高于对照组(16.9‰±9.3对11.1‰±6.0,P = 0.001)。暴露受试者中着丝粒微核的频率高于对照组(17.3‰±11.5对10.3‰±7.1),但差异不显著。暴露受试者中单核着丝粒微核的频率显著高于对照组(11.0‰±6.2对3.1‰±2.4,P<0.001),而无着丝粒微核的频率在暴露受试者和对照组中相似(分别为3.7‰±4.2和4.1‰±2.7)。病理学家/解剖学家外周淋巴细胞中染色体损伤的增强(特别是染色体丢失)强调了制定安全计划的必要性。