Jones Shayne, Cauffman Elizabeth, Miller Joshua D, Mulvey Edward
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2006 Mar;18(1):33-48. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.33.
There has been a recent push to extend the construct of psychopathy into adolescence, primarily as a result of the impressive reliability, validity, and utility of this construct in samples of adults. The value of this work rests, however, on creating an equally reliable and valid assessment tool for adolescents. One promising measure is the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (A. E. Forth, D. S. Kosson, & R. D. Hare, 2003). The current study uses a large, diverse sample of serious adolescent offenders to assess the overall fit of various underlying factor structures of this measure and to test the equivalence of these models across sex and race/ethnicity. The results suggest that either a 3- or 4-factor model provides the best overall fit and that these models are invariant across sex and race/ethnicity. The decision to use the 3- or 4-factor model will likely hinge on researchers' underlying conceptualization of psychopathy, specifically whether antisocial behavior is viewed as a core feature of this construct.
最近有一种趋势,即将精神病态的概念扩展到青少年群体,这主要是因为该概念在成年样本中具有令人印象深刻的信度、效度和实用性。然而,这项工作的价值取决于能否为青少年创建一个同样可靠且有效的评估工具。一个有前景的测量工具是《精神病态量表:青少年版》(A. E. 福思、D. S. 科索恩和R. D. 黑尔,2003年)。本研究使用了一个由严重青少年罪犯组成的大型多样化样本,以评估该测量工具各种潜在因素结构的整体拟合度,并检验这些模型在性别和种族/民族方面的等效性。结果表明,三因素模型或四因素模型提供了最佳的整体拟合度,并且这些模型在性别和种族/民族方面是不变的。使用三因素模型还是四因素模型的决定可能取决于研究人员对精神病态的潜在概念化,特别是反社会行为是否被视为该概念的核心特征。