Suppr超能文献

青少年罪犯的精神病态:反社会过程筛查装置-自我报告和青少年精神病态检查表的项目反应理论研究。

Psychopathy in adolescent offenders: an item response theory study of the antisocial process screening device-self report and the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version.

机构信息

Children’s Behavioral Health, Children’s of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2013 Apr;4(2):101-20. doi: 10.1037/a0028439. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Abstract

Few studies have examined the item functioning of youth psychopathy measures or compared the functioning of clinician and self-report based indices. Even fewer studies have made these comparisons in both male and female adolescent samples. The present study examined the applicability of items from two psychopathy measures, the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD; Frick, P. J., & Hare, R. D., 2001, The Antisocial Process Screening Device. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems) and Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV; Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D., 2003, The Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems), to adolescent boys and girls who had come into contact with the law. Item Response Theory was used to test item functioning of the two psychopathy indices. Examination of the Item Response Theory trace lines indicated that the APSD and the PCL:YV have both highly discriminating and poorly discriminating items and that the measures differ in the regions of psychopathy they cover. The PCL:YV is particularly effective at assessing interpersonal and affective features of psychopathy and to a lesser extent, lifestyle and antisocial features. The APSD appears to be effective at assessing narcissism and impulsivity but not callousness. In addition, the items most discriminating of the underlying construct of psychopathy for males and females demonstrate some important differences. These findings suggest that the measures may tap different underlying elements of the same overlaying construct. This may account for modest correlations between the measures. The findings suggest that clinicians should be aware of the regions that each measure best taps and also suggest that continued refinement and revisions to the youth psychopathy measures may be required.

摘要

很少有研究检查过青少年精神病态测量的项目功能,也很少有研究比较过临床医生和自我报告为基础的指标的功能。更少有研究在男性和女性青少年样本中进行过这些比较。本研究检验了两种精神病态测量工具的项目的适用性,即反社会过程筛选装置(APSD;Frick,PJ,& Hare,RD,2001,反社会过程筛选装置。安大略省多伦多,加拿大:多健康系统)和精神病态检查表:青少年版(PCL:YV;Forth,AE,Kosson,DS,& Hare,RD,2003,精神病态检查表:青少年版。安大略省多伦多,加拿大:多健康系统),适用于接触过法律的青少年男孩和女孩。项目反应理论用于测试这两种精神病态指数的项目功能。对项目反应理论迹线的检查表明,APSD 和 PCL:YV 都具有高度区分性和低度区分性的项目,并且这些测量工具在它们所涵盖的精神病态区域上有所不同。PCL:YV 特别有效地评估精神病态的人际和情感特征,在较小程度上,评估生活方式和反社会特征。APSD 似乎在评估自恋和冲动方面很有效,但在评估无情方面效果较差。此外,对男性和女性精神病态潜在结构最具区分性的项目存在一些重要差异。这些发现表明,这些测量工具可能触及了同一重叠结构的不同潜在要素。这可能解释了这些测量工具之间的相关性不高。这些发现表明,临床医生应该意识到每种测量工具最能触及的区域,也表明可能需要对青少年精神病态测量工具进行进一步的改进和修订。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验