• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全能性、孪生现象与受精时的赋灵。

Totipotency, twinning, and ensoulment at fertilization.

作者信息

Koch-Hershenov Rose

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Niagara University, Niagara University, New York 14109, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2006 Apr;31(2):139-64. doi: 10.1080/03605310600588673.

DOI:10.1080/03605310600588673
PMID:16595345
Abstract

From fertilization to approximately the sixteenth day of development, human embryonic cells are said to have the capacities of totipotency and monozygotic twinning, both of which are problematic to a theory of ensoulment at fertilization. In this article I will address the problems which these capacities pose to such a theory and present an interpretation of the biological data which renders ensoulment at fertilization more plausible. I will then argue that not only is an ensoulment theory consistent with current biological data on the human embryo, but it may offer an explanation for the phenomencon of monozygotic twinning.

摘要

从受精到发育大约第十六天,人类胚胎细胞被认为具有全能性和单卵孪生的能力,这两者对于受精时灵魂赋予的理论来说都是有问题的。在本文中,我将探讨这些能力给这样一种理论带来的问题,并给出对生物学数据的一种解释,这种解释使受精时的灵魂赋予更具合理性。然后我将论证,灵魂赋予理论不仅与当前关于人类胚胎的生物学数据一致,而且它可能为单卵孪生现象提供一种解释。

相似文献

1
Totipotency, twinning, and ensoulment at fertilization.全能性、孪生现象与受精时的赋灵。
J Med Philos. 2006 Apr;31(2):139-64. doi: 10.1080/03605310600588673.
2
Immediate animation: Thomistic principles applied to Norman Ford's objections.即时复苏:托马斯主义原则应用于诺曼·福特的反对意见。
Ethics Med. 2005 Spring;21(1):11-28.
3
Fission and confusion.分裂与混乱。
Christ Bioeth. 2006 Dec;12(3):237-54. doi: 10.1080/13803600601038358.
4
The embryo and the fetus: new moral contexts.胚胎与胎儿:新的道德背景。
Theol Stud. 1993 Mar;54(1):124-42.
5
When does human life begin?
Ethics Med. 2005 Summer;21(2):69-71.
6
The beginning of personhood: a Thomistic biological analysis.人格的开端:一种托马斯主义的生物学分析。
Bioethics. 2000 Apr;14(2):134-57. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00186.
7
The inhuman use of human beings: a statement on embryo research.对人类的非人道利用:关于胚胎研究的声明
First Things. 1995 Jan;49:17-21.
8
The zygote, the embryo, and personhood: an attempt at conceptual clarification.
Ethics Med. 1994 Spring;10(1):2-7.
9
The moral status of the human embryo: the twinning argument.人类胚胎的道德地位:孪生论证
Free Inq. 2002;23(1):45-8.
10
"Altered nuclear transfer": probing the nature of being human.“改变的核移植”:探究人类的本质
Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2005 Summer;5(2):261-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Twinning and Individuation: An Appraisal of the Current Model and Ethical Implications.双胎妊娠与个体化:对当前模型及伦理意义的评估
Biology (Basel). 2025 Jan 21;14(2):104. doi: 10.3390/biology14020104.
2
"To Be or Not to Be" a Conscientious Objector to Voluntary Abortion: An Italian Web-Survey of Healthcare Workers.成为或不成为自愿堕胎的出于良心拒服兵役者:一项针对医护人员的意大利网络调查
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 2;60(12):1984. doi: 10.3390/medicina60121984.
3
The Mereotopology of Pregnancy.妊娠的 Mereotopology
J Med Philos. 2023 May 16;48(3):283-298. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad017.
4
Conflicts Between Women's Religiosity and Sense of Free Will in the Context of Elective Abortion: A Qualitative Study in the Worst Period of Italy's COVID-19 Crisis.选择性堕胎背景下女性宗教信仰与自由意志感之间的冲突:意大利新冠疫情危机最严重时期的一项定性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 2;12:619684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.619684. eCollection 2021.
5
The Mathematics (and Metaphysics) of Identical Twins.同卵双胞胎的数学(与形而上学)
Linacre Q. 2020 Aug;87(3):278-291. doi: 10.1177/0024363920920396. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Twin Inc.双胞胎公司
Theor Med Bioeth. 2018 Aug;39(4):301-319. doi: 10.1007/s11017-018-9461-0.
7
Can one be two? A synopsis of the twinning and personhood debate.一个人能变成两个人吗?孪生与人格辩论概要。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2013 Sep;31(2):37-59. doi: 10.1007/BF03351547.
8
Totipotency: what it is and what it is not.全能性:其内涵与非内涵
Stem Cells Dev. 2014 Apr 15;23(8):796-812. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0364. Epub 2014 Feb 12.