Wijsbek A M, Majoor G D, Slaaf D W, Bos G M, Meijers-Jellema R, Weijmer-Van Velzen J S, Van Breda Vriesman P J
Department of Immunology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Int J Microcirc Clin Exp. 1991 Aug;10(3):193-204.
The sensitivity of fluorescence intravital microscopy for the detection of immunologically elicited inflammatory reactions in the skin was compared to assessment by tissue swelling measurement. Rats were immunized to the contact-sensitizing agent toluene diisocyanate (TDI) by its application to the skin and challenged by the same procedure at a different site one week thereafter. At 2, 6, or 12 hrs after challenge individual rats received a bolus of fluorescently labeled albumin intravenously. Vascular integrity was determined by estimating the surface of areas with increased vascular permeability as observed by fluorescence intravital microscopy; contact dermatitis (CD) was assessed just prior to infusion of labeled albumin determination of tissue swelling by a semi-automatic micrometer. At 12 hrs after challenge, CD was detectable by tissue swelling. Intravital fluorescence microscopy revealed massive extravasation of the fluorescent dye at the site of challenge. At 6 hrs after challenge, CD was not yet discernible by toe thickness measurements. However, by fluorescence intravital microscopy significant leakage of labeled albumin was observed. Thus, at 6 hrs after challenge fluorescence intravital microscopy was more sensitive than determination of tissue thickness increment for detection of a contact hypersensitivity reaction. At 2 hrs after challenge, CD was neither demonstrable by tissue swelling measurements, nor by fluorescence intravital microscopy. Therefore, an early component of a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction to a contact allergen as shown to occur in mice, remains to be demonstrated in the rat. On the other hand, fluorescence intravital microscopy revealed non-immunological skin irritation by a 5% TDI solution within 2 hrs after its application to the skin of non-immunized rats.
将荧光活体显微镜检测皮肤免疫引发的炎症反应的灵敏度与通过组织肿胀测量进行的评估作了比较。通过将接触致敏剂甲苯二异氰酸酯(TDI)涂抹于大鼠皮肤使其致敏,并在一周后于不同部位采用相同程序进行激发。激发后2、6或12小时,给每只大鼠静脉注射一剂荧光标记的白蛋白。通过估计荧光活体显微镜观察到的血管通透性增加区域的面积来确定血管完整性;在输注标记白蛋白之前,通过半自动测微计测定组织肿胀来评估接触性皮炎(CD)。激发后12小时,可通过组织肿胀检测到CD。活体荧光显微镜显示激发部位有大量荧光染料外渗。激发后6小时,通过测量趾部厚度还无法辨别CD。然而,通过荧光活体显微镜观察到有明显的标记白蛋白渗漏。因此,激发后6小时,荧光活体显微镜在检测接触性超敏反应方面比测定组织厚度增加更敏感。激发后2小时,无论是通过组织肿胀测量还是荧光活体显微镜都无法证实CD。因此,接触变应原后迟发型超敏反应(DTH)的早期成分,如在小鼠中显示的那样,在大鼠中仍有待证实。另一方面,荧光活体显微镜显示,将5%TDI溶液涂抹于未免疫大鼠皮肤后2小时内会出现非免疫性皮肤刺激。