Al-Omran Abdallah, Sadat-Ali Mir
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Med J. 2006 Apr;27(4):507-10.
The purpose of this study is to review the outcome of fracture femur in elderly patients (>65 years), and to identify cause or causes of mortality.
Between January 1996 and December 2002, 115 patients over 65 years were admitted and operated at King Fahd University Hospital, Al-Khobar. Fifty-six of patients suffered with femoral fractures. Demographic data collected included age, gender, site of fracture, co-morbidities, delay in surgery, duration of surgery, implant used and Anesthesia Society of America scoring (ASA). A minimum follow up of 12 months was considered important for inclusion in the study. Patients remained alive were assessed for their functional independence.
The data of 48 patients were gathered for analysis. There were 31 males and 17 females with a mean age of 76.5 years (age range 65-101 years). The mean follow up was 32.8 months (12-84 months +/- SD 17.81). There were 32 fractures of the trochanteric area. The average delay in surgery was 112 hours (24-280 hours). At the end of 24 months: 13 (27%) were dead and 28 (80%) were functionally independent similar to pre-injury status. There was statistical significance between the ASA score and the mortality (p<0.005). However, mortality significantly higher in patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia p<0.05.
Our data indicate that the mortality in the elderly is not related to the delay in surgery. The significant factors to early demise of patients were high ASA score, and the type of anesthesia used during surgery.
本研究旨在回顾老年患者(>65岁)股骨骨折的治疗结果,并确定死亡原因。
1996年1月至2002年12月期间,115名65岁以上的患者在胡拜尔法赫德国王大学医院入院并接受手术。其中56例患者患有股骨骨折。收集的人口统计学数据包括年龄、性别、骨折部位、合并症、手术延迟时间、手术时长、使用的植入物以及美国麻醉医师协会评分(ASA)。纳入研究的患者需至少随访12个月。对存活患者的功能独立性进行评估。
收集了48例患者的数据进行分析。其中男性31例,女性17例,平均年龄76.5岁(年龄范围65 - 101岁)。平均随访时间为32.8个月(12 - 84个月,标准差±17.81)。转子区骨折32例。手术平均延迟时间为112小时(24 - 280小时)。在24个月结束时:13例(27%)死亡,28例(80%)功能独立,与受伤前状态相似。ASA评分与死亡率之间存在统计学意义(p<0.005)。然而,全身麻醉下接受手术的患者死亡率显著更高(p<0.05)。
我们的数据表明,老年人的死亡率与手术延迟无关。导致患者早期死亡的重要因素是高ASA评分和手术期间使用的麻醉类型。