• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical and radiographically/neuroimaging documented outcome in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

作者信息

Houten John K, Post Nicholas H, Dryer Joseph W, Errico Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, New York, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Mar 15;20(3):E8. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.9.

DOI:10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.9
PMID:16599424
Abstract

OBJECT

Although transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is an increasingly popular surgical technique, there are a limited number of studies in which investigators have stratified outcome data with respect to surgical indications or documented radiographically proven and clinical results with respect to disc space height (DSH). The authors conducted a study to evaluate the long-term outcomes after TLIF with respect to surgical indication and radiographic/neuroimaging results.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive TLIF-treated patients underwent follow-up investigation for a mean of 37 months. Isthmic spondylolysis was present in eight patients, recurrent disc herniation in 14, and degenerative disc disease (DDD) in 11. The operative technique involved the placement of interbody structural allograft, pedicle screw instrumentation, and morcellized autograft in the anterior interbody space and the contralateral intertransverse gutter. Surgery was performed at L4-5 in 16 patients, L5-S1 in 14, L3-4 in two, and both L4-5 and L5-S1 in one patient. Preoperative symptoms were back pain (in 91% of cases), leg pain (in 94%), sensory loss (in 67%), and motor deficits (in 30%). Postoperatively, back pain was improved in 67% of the patients, unchanged in 27%, and worsened in 7%. Leg pain improved in 80% of patients, was unchanged in 10%, and worsened in 10%. Outcome, as measured using the Prolo Functional and Economic Scales, improved from a score of 4.9 to 7. In patients with spondylolysis and recurrent disc herniation outcomes were better than in those with DDD only. There was no correlation of outcome with symptom duration, patient age, or level of surgery. In an independent review of pre- and late postoperative radiographs no significant differences in lordosis angles, Cobb angles, or DSHs were found. Fusion occurred in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The TLIF procedure was associated with good clinical outcomes and a high fusion rate but no change in the DSH. Patients who present with spondylolysis and recurrent herniations experience better outcome than those with degenerative disease alone.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical and radiographically/neuroimaging documented outcome in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Mar 15;20(3):E8. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.9.
2
Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.双侧植入低轮廓椎间融合器:下沉、前凸及融合分析。
Spine J. 2003 Sep-Oct;3(5):377-87. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00145-1.
3
Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与经皮椎弓根螺钉固定增强的前路腰椎椎间融合术:成人低度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱手术疗效比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Apr;22(2):114-21. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318169bff5.
4
[Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].腰椎滑脱症腰骶融合术后相邻节段退变:一项回顾性影像学及临床分析
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010 Apr;77(2):124-30.
5
Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.环形融合:前路腰椎间融合术联合后路经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗 L5-S1 峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的对比分析。
Spine J. 2018 Mar;18(3):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.227. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
6
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
7
Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.L4-5椎体滑脱症中的放射学相邻节段退变:动态稳定与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Sep;29(3):250-258. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17993. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
8
Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与股骨皮质骨同种异体移植作为单节段椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Dec;5(6):534-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.5.6.534.
9
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:各种内固定技术对腰椎灵活性的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):E65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113034.74567.86.
10
Transvertebral Transsacral strut grafting for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 with fibular allograft.经椎弓根经骶骨支撑植骨术治疗L5-S1重度峡部裂性腰椎滑脱伴腓骨异体骨移植
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Jul;21(5):328-33. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318149e7ea.

引用本文的文献

1
Bilateral decompression during unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion significantly reduces contralateral radiculopathy: A retrospective analysis.单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中双侧减压可显著降低对侧神经根病:一项回顾性分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Sep;53(9):3000605251374637. doi: 10.1177/03000605251374637. Epub 2025 Sep 8.
2
Modified vertebral bone quality score is a better predictor of cage subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and is superior to vertebral bone quality score.改良椎体骨质量评分是经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉的更好预测指标,且优于椎体骨质量评分。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 26. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09178-0.
3
Predictive Value of Preoperative Nutritional Risk Index for Screw Loosening After Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Elderly Patients With Lumbar Spine Diseases.
腰椎疾病老年患者腰椎椎间融合术后螺钉松动的术前营养风险指数预测价值
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):1152-1161. doi: 10.1111/os.14369. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review.从慢性下背痛的长期研究中我们能学到什么?范围综述。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Apr;31(4):901-916. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07111-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Parameters in Open TLIF Versus MIS-TLIF in Single- or Double-Level Lumbar Surgeries.单节段或双节段腰椎手术中开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的临床结果及影像学参数比较
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):962-970. doi: 10.14444/8126. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Screw-Related Complications After Instrumentation of the Osteoporotic Spine: A Systematic Literature Review With Meta-Analysis.骨质疏松性脊柱内固定术后与螺钉相关的并发症:一项Meta分析的系统文献综述
Global Spine J. 2020 Feb;10(1):69-88. doi: 10.1177/2192568218818164. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for dual-segment lower lumbar degenerative disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗双节段下腰椎退变性疾病
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Dec;13(4):525-532. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76151. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
8
Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.对于单节段退变性腰椎疾病,微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术是否优于开放手术:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Sep 20;13(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0941-8.
9
Allograft Versus Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented and Noninstrumented Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review.器械辅助与非器械辅助腰椎融合术中同种异体骨与脱矿骨基质的比较:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2018 Jun;8(4):396-412. doi: 10.1177/2192568217735342. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与传统开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较:一项更新的Meta分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Aug 20;129(16):1969-86. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.187847.