Troidle Laura, Finkelstein Fred
New Haven CAPD, Renal Research Institute, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006 Apr 6;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-5-6.
CPD-associated peritonitis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for ESRD patients maintained on CPD therapy. The percentage of ESRD patients maintained on CPD therapy is declining. The reasons are unclear, but may be due to concerns about CPD-associated peritonitis. The incidence of CPD-associated peritonitis has decreased largely attributed to technical advances and the identification of risk factors including exit-site infection, colonization with Staphylococcus aureus and depression. The typical spectrum of organisms causing peritonitis include gram-positive organisms (67%), gram-negative organisms (28%), fungi (2.5%) or anaerobic organisms (2.5%). Culture-negative episodes do occur: up to 20% of the episodes of peritonitis in some series are culture-negative. The treatment of CPD associated peritonitis is rather standardized with current recommendations by the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis universally adopted. Approximately 80% of the patients developing peritonitis will respond to antimicrobial therapy and remain on CPD therapy, while 10 to 15% of the patients require catheter removal and transfer to hemodialysis. Approximately 6% of the patients expire as a result of peritonitis. The outcome is different based on organism with gram-negative and fungal episodes having a worse outcome than gram-positive episodes. The development of CPD-associated peritonitis can be linked to traditional risk factors such as exit-site infection and poor technique. Bacterial biofilm has also been suggested as a cause of peritonitis. Our current antimicrobial protocols may not permit adequate dosing to penetrate the biofilm and be a reason for recurrent or repeat episodes of peritonitis. It is important that we improve our understanding of factors responsible for the development and outcome of CPD-associated peritonitis in order for this renal replacement therapy to remain a viable option for patients with ESRD.
持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CPD)相关腹膜炎是接受CPD治疗的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。接受CPD治疗的ESRD患者比例正在下降。原因尚不清楚,但可能是由于对CPD相关腹膜炎的担忧。CPD相关腹膜炎的发生率已大幅下降,这在很大程度上归因于技术进步以及对包括出口处感染、金黄色葡萄球菌定植和抑郁在内的危险因素的识别。引起腹膜炎的典型微生物谱包括革兰氏阳性菌(67%)、革兰氏阴性菌(28%)、真菌(2.5%)或厌氧菌(2.5%)。确实会出现培养阴性的情况:在某些系列中,高达20%的腹膜炎发作是培养阴性的。CPD相关腹膜炎的治疗相当标准化,国际腹膜透析学会的当前建议被普遍采用。发生腹膜炎的患者中约80%对抗菌治疗有反应,并继续接受CPD治疗,而10%至15%的患者需要拔除导管并转为血液透析。约6%的患者因腹膜炎死亡。根据微生物种类不同,结果也不同,革兰氏阴性菌和真菌发作的结果比革兰氏阳性菌发作更差。CPD相关腹膜炎的发生可能与出口处感染和技术不佳等传统危险因素有关。细菌生物膜也被认为是腹膜炎的一个原因。我们目前的抗菌方案可能无法保证足够的剂量穿透生物膜,这可能是腹膜炎复发或再次发作的一个原因。重要的是,我们要更好地了解导致CPD相关腹膜炎发生和转归的因素,以便这种肾脏替代治疗仍然是ESRD患者的可行选择。