Harte Philip T, Konikow Leonard F, Hornberger George Z
U.S. Geological Survey, Pembroke, NH 03275, USA.
J Contam Hydrol. 2006 May 30;85(3-4):247-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.02.012. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
Low-permeability, non-reactive barrier walls are often used to contain contaminants in an aquifer. Rates of solute transport through such barriers are typically many orders of magnitude slower than rates through the aquifer. Nevertheless, the success of remedial actions may be sensitive to these low rates of transport. Two numerical simulation methods for representing low-permeability barriers in a finite-difference groundwater-flow and transport model were tested. In the first method, the hydraulic properties of the barrier were represented directly on grid cells and in the second method, the intercell hydraulic-conductance values were adjusted to approximate the reduction in horizontal flow, allowing use of a coarser and computationally efficient grid. The alternative methods were tested and evaluated on the basis of hypothetical test problems and a field case involving tetrachloroethylene (PCE) contamination at a Superfund site in New Hampshire. For all cases, advective transport across the barrier was negligible, but preexisting numerical approaches to calculate dispersion yielded dispersive fluxes that were greater than expected. A transport model (MODFLOW-GWT) was modified to (1) allow different dispersive and diffusive properties to be assigned to the barrier than the adjacent aquifer and (2) more accurately calculate dispersion from concentration gradients and solute fluxes near barriers. The new approach yields reasonable and accurate concentrations for the test cases.
低渗透性、非反应性防渗墙常被用于控制含水层中的污染物。溶质通过此类防渗墙的传输速率通常比通过含水层的速率慢许多个数量级。然而,修复行动的成功可能对这些低传输速率很敏感。在一个有限差分地下水流与传输模型中,测试了两种用于表示低渗透性防渗墙的数值模拟方法。在第一种方法中,防渗墙的水力特性直接在网格单元上表示,而在第二种方法中,单元间的水力传导率值被调整以近似水平水流的减少,从而可以使用更粗且计算效率更高的网格。基于假设的测试问题以及新罕布什尔州一个超级基金场地涉及四氯乙烯(PCE)污染的现场案例,对这两种替代方法进行了测试和评估。对于所有案例,穿过防渗墙的平流传输可忽略不计,但现有的计算弥散的数值方法产生的弥散通量大于预期。对一个传输模型(MODFLOW - GWT)进行了修改,以便(1)能够为防渗墙赋予与相邻含水层不同的弥散和扩散特性,以及(2)更准确地根据防渗墙附近的浓度梯度和溶质通量计算弥散。新方法为测试案例得出了合理且准确的浓度结果。