Patou G, Ayliffe U
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, London.
J Clin Pathol. 1991 Oct;44(10):831-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.10.831.
An indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Parvoscan-B19; Sweden) was compared with an in-house MACRIA for the detection of B19 specific IgM. A Parvoscan-B19 IgG test was also evaluated for its ability to detect a recent B19 infection in paired sera. Two hundred and twenty sera submitted to the laboratory for B19 serology and four MACRIA positive control sera were assayed for B19 IgM. Confirmation of the response of sera giving discordant results in the two assays was sought by the use of a "nested" polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of B19 DNA. The Parvoscan-B19 IgM test was 79% sensitive and 96% specific. Parvoscan-B19 was poor at detecting parvovirus infection in sera collected two to three months after the onset of symptoms. When sera collected more than seven weeks after the onset of symptoms were excluded from the analysis, Parvoscan-B19 IgM was 84% sensitive and 96% specific. Rubella specific IgM positive sera, rheumatoid factor positive sera, and heterophil antibody positive sera were also assayed for B19 IgM. No false positive results were encountered with these problematic sera. By using the cut off criteria for the Parvoscan-IgM test previously advocated by the manufacturers, 90% sensitivity and 87% specificity could be achieved. False positive results, however, occurred with six of the 17 rubella IgM positive sera, four of the 10 rheumatoid factor positive sera, and two of the 11 heterophil antibody positive sera tested. It is concluded that the Parvoscan-B19 was specific but insensitive when compared with in-house assays.
将一种间接酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)(Parvoscan - B19;瑞典)与一种自制的巨噬细胞吸附放射免疫测定法(MACRIA)进行比较,以检测B19特异性IgM。还评估了Parvoscan - B19 IgG检测在配对血清中检测近期B19感染的能力。对提交至实验室进行B19血清学检测的220份血清以及4份MACRIA阳性对照血清进行B19 IgM检测。对于两种检测结果不一致的血清反应,通过使用“巢式”聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测B19 DNA来寻求确认。Parvoscan - B19 IgM检测的敏感性为79%,特异性为96%。Parvoscan - B19在检测症状出现后两到三个月采集的血清中的细小病毒感染方面效果不佳。当将症状出现后超过七周采集的血清排除在分析之外时,Parvoscan - B19 IgM的敏感性为84%,特异性为96%。还对风疹特异性IgM阳性血清、类风湿因子阳性血清和嗜异性抗体阳性血清进行了B19 IgM检测。这些有问题的血清未出现假阳性结果。按照制造商先前倡导的Parvoscan - IgM检测的截断标准,可实现90%的敏感性和87%的特异性。然而,在检测的17份风疹IgM阳性血清中有6份、10份类风湿因子阳性血清中有4份以及11份嗜异性抗体阳性血清中有2份出现了假阳性结果。结论是,与自制检测方法相比,Parvoscan - B19具有特异性但不敏感。