Briganti Alberto, Naspro Richard, Gallina Andrea, Salonia Andrea, Vavassori Ivano, Hurle Rodolfo, Scattoni Enzo, Rigatti Patrizio, Montorsi Francesco
Department of Urology, Universitá Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1817-21. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00983-3.
We compared the impact of HoLEP and TURP on sexual function.
Between January 2002 and January 2003, 120 patients with a mean age +/- SD of 65.2 +/- 7.1 years who had benign prostatic hyperplasia were enrolled in this 2-center, prospective, randomized study. A total of 60 patients with a mean age of 65.25 +/- 6.9 years underwent HoLEP (group 1) and 60 with a mean age of 64.18 +/- 7.2 years underwent TURP (group 2). Patients were assessed before surgery, and at 12 and 24-month followup visits. Subjective symptoms were scored by the International Prostate Symptom Score, the International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life question, IIEF, 10 nonvalidated general assessment questions, physical examination, serum prostate specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography.
A total of 32 patients (53.3%) in group 1 and 31 (51.6%) in group 2 reported various degrees of erectile dysfunction before surgery according to the IIEF-EF score. Differences between preoperative and postoperative orgasmic domain scores in each group were significant (p <0.001). A slight but not significant increase in the mean IIEF-EF domain score was reported in each group at postoperative assessments without any difference between the 2 surgical approaches. According to general assessment question analysis the prevalence of subjectively reported postoperative retrograde ejaculation was significantly higher than at baseline assessment in the 2 groups with no differences between the 2 surgical procedures.
TURP and HoLEP significantly lowered the IIEF orgasmic function domain with no differences between techniques. This was caused by retrograde ejaculation. Marginal, nonsignificant erectile function improvement was reported after surgery in the 2 groups.
我们比较了holmium激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)和经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)对性功能的影响。
2002年1月至2003年1月期间,120例平均年龄为65.2±7.1岁的良性前列腺增生患者被纳入这项双中心、前瞻性、随机研究。共有60例平均年龄为65.25±6.9岁的患者接受了holmium激光前列腺剜除术(第1组),60例平均年龄为64.18±7.2岁的患者接受了经尿道前列腺电切术(第2组)。在手术前以及术后12个月和24个月的随访时对患者进行评估。主观症状通过国际前列腺症状评分、国际前列腺症状评分生活质量问题、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)、10个未经验证的一般评估问题、体格检查、血清前列腺特异性抗原和经直肠超声检查进行评分。
根据IIEF勃起功能评分,第1组共有32例患者(53.3%)和第2组31例患者(51.6%)在手术前报告有不同程度的勃起功能障碍。每组术前和术后性高潮领域评分之间的差异具有显著性(p<0.001)。在术后评估中,每组的平均IIEF勃起功能领域评分均有轻微但不显著的增加,两种手术方式之间无差异。根据一般评估问题分析,两组主观报告的术后逆行射精发生率均显著高于基线评估时,两种手术方法之间无差异。
TURP和holmium激光前列腺剜除术均显著降低了IIEF性高潮功能领域,两种技术之间无差异。这是由逆行射精引起的。两组术后均报告有轻微的、不显著的勃起功能改善。