Yu Xinhua, McBean A Marshall, Caldwell Debra S
Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1830-5; discussion 1835. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00997-3.
We compared the availability and use of transurethral microwave therapy, transurethral needle ablation, contact or noncontact laser therapy and transurethral resection of the prostate among elderly black and white Medicare beneficiaries.
We examined 100% Medicare Inpatient, Outpatient, Carrier and Denominator files of men 65 years old or older who underwent these procedures in 1999 through 2001. White-to-black race rate ratios for each procedure were computed for the entire United States, as well as for a restricted set of counties in which procedures were available to black beneficiaries.
A total of 170,067 TURP, 16,953 TUMT, 5,353 TUNA and 12,134 Laser procedures were performed during 3 years. Nationally there was only a 3% difference in the age adjusted TURP rates between white and black men (6.13 and 5.94 per 1,000 person-years, respectively). However, the age adjusted rates for TUMT and TUNA among white men were about twice those among black men (0.63 vs 0.31 and 0.20 vs 0.10 per 1,000 person-years, respectively). Laser rates were 17% higher among white men than among black men (0.44 vs 0.38 per 1,000 person-years). Large geographic variation existed in the new procedure rates. Negative binomial regression analysis confirmed the national findings in those counties in which the procedures were available to black men. Adjusted white-to-black rate ratios were 1.96 (95% CI 1.70-2.25) for TUMT, 2.33 (95% CI 1.87-2.90) for TUNA and 1.36 (95% CI 1.16-1.59) for Laser.
After controlling for availability, elderly black Medicare beneficiaries were less likely to undergo the new BPH procedures than white beneficiaries, while the usage difference for TURP remained small.
我们比较了老年黑人和白人医疗保险受益人中经尿道微波治疗、经尿道针刺消融、接触式或非接触式激光治疗以及经尿道前列腺切除术的可及性和使用情况。
我们检查了1999年至2001年期间接受这些手术的65岁及以上男性的100%医疗保险住院、门诊、承保人和分母文件。计算了全美国以及一组有限的县(在这些县中黑人受益人可接受这些手术)中每种手术的白人与黑人种族率比。
在3年期间共进行了170,067例经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)、16,953例经尿道微波热疗(TUMT)、5,353例经尿道针刺消融术(TUNA)和12,134例激光手术。在全国范围内,白人和黑人男性经年龄调整后的TURP率仅相差3%(分别为每1000人年6.13例和5.94例)。然而,白人男性中TUMT和TUNA的年龄调整率约为黑人男性的两倍(分别为每1000人年0.63例对0.31例以及0.20例对0.10例)。白人男性的激光手术率比黑人男性高17%(每1000人年0.44例对0.38例)。新手术率存在很大的地理差异。负二项回归分析证实了在黑人男性可接受这些手术的县中的全国性研究结果。TUMT的调整后白人与黑人率比为1.96(95%可信区间1.70 - 2.25),TUNA为2.33(95%可信区间1.87 - 2.90),激光手术为1.36(95%可信区间1.16 - 1.59)。
在控制可及性之后,老年黑人医疗保险受益人比白人受益人接受新型良性前列腺增生手术的可能性更小,而TURP的使用差异仍然很小。