Suppr超能文献

基于证据的风险评估框架的制定。

Development of an Evidence-Based Risk Assessment Framework.

机构信息

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

ALTEX. 2022;39(4):667-693. doi: 10.14573/altex.2004041. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

Abstract

Assessment of potential human health risks associated with environmental and other agents requires careful evaluation of all available and relevant evidence for the agent of interest, including both data-rich and data-poor agents. With the advent of new approach methodologies in toxicological risk assessment, guidance on integrating evidence from mul-tiple evidence streams is needed to ensure that all available data is given due consideration in both qualitative and quantitative risk assessment. The present report summarizes the discussions among academic, government, and private sector participants from North America and Europe in an international workshop convened to explore the development of an evidence-based risk assessment framework, taking into account all available evidence in an appropriate manner in order to arrive at the best possible characterization of potential human health risks and associated uncertainty. Although consensus among workshop participants was not a specific goal, there was general agreement on the key consider-ations involved in evidence-based risk assessment incorporating 21st century science into human health risk assessment. These considerations have been embodied into an overarching prototype framework for evidence integration that will be explored in more depth in a follow-up meeting.

摘要

评估环境和其他因素相关的潜在人类健康风险需要仔细评估所有相关和可用的证据,包括数据丰富和数据匮乏的因素。随着毒理学风险评估中新方法的出现,需要关于整合多个证据来源的证据的指南,以确保在定性和定量风险评估中充分考虑所有可用数据。本报告总结了来自北美和欧洲的学术界、政府和私营部门参与者在一次国际研讨会上的讨论,该研讨会旨在探索制定一个基于证据的风险评估框架,以适当的方式考虑所有可用的证据,以便对潜在的人类健康风险和相关不确定性进行最佳描述。尽管研讨会参与者之间没有达成具体共识,但对于将 21 世纪科学纳入人类健康风险评估的基于证据的风险评估所涉及的关键考虑因素,存在普遍共识。这些考虑因素已经被纳入一个总体原型框架中,用于证据整合,将在后续会议中进行更深入的探讨。

相似文献

1
Development of an Evidence-Based Risk Assessment Framework.基于证据的风险评估框架的制定。
ALTEX. 2022;39(4):667-693. doi: 10.14573/altex.2004041. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9

引用本文的文献

5
Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!将新方法(NAMs)数据纳入剂量反应评估:未来已来!
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2025 Jan 2;28(1):28-62. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2024.2412571. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The methodological rigour of systematic reviews in environmental health.环境健康系统综述的方法学严谨性。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2022 Mar;52(3):167-187. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2022.2082917. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
4
Systematic review in evidence-based risk assessment.系统评价在循证风险评估中的应用。
ALTEX. 2022;39(3):463–479. doi: 10.14573/altex.2004111. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验