Güell Rosa, Resqueti Vanesa, Sangenis Mercedes, Morante Fatima, Martorell Bernardi, Casan Pere, Guyatt Gordon H
Departament de Pneumologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i de Sant Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona [corrected] Barcelona, Spain.
Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):899-904. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.899.
To assess the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) on psychosocial morbidity, functional exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with severe COPD.
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial with blinding of outcome assessment and data analysis.
A tertiary-care respiratory service.
Forty patients (mean age, 65 +/- 8 years [+/- SD]) with severe chronic flow limitation (FEV(1), 35 +/- 13%) without respiratory failure (Pao(2), 72 +/- 9 mm Hg; Paco(2), 42 +/- 5 mm Hg) were randomized either to a control group or to a PR group (PRG).
Sixteen weeks of PR that included breathing retraining and exercise.
At baseline and 16 weeks, we evaluated psychosocial morbidity using two questionnaires (the Millon Behavior Health Inventory [MBHI] and the Revised Symptom Checklist [SCL-90-R]) and measured 6-min walk distance (6WMD) and HRQL using the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ).
We found differences in favor of the PRG in the following MBHI domains: introversive, forceful, and sensitive personality styles (all p </= 0.05) and chronic tension (p </= 0.01). Results of the depression, hostility, global severity, positive symptom distress index (all p </= 0.01), somatization, anxiety, psychoticism, and positive symptom (all p </= 0.05) domains of the SCL-90-R favored the PRG. We also found statistically and clinically significant differences between groups in 6MWD (85 m; p < 0.01) and in two domains of the CRQ: dyspnea (1.0; p < 0.01) and mastery (0.6; p < 0.05). The other two domains of CRQ showed strong trends in favor of PRG: 0.7 for both fatigue and emotional function (minimal important difference, 0.5).
PR may decrease psychosocial morbidity in COPD patients even when no specific psychological intervention is performed. Findings from this study also confirm the positive impact of PR on functional exercise capacity and HRQL.
评估肺康复(PR)对重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者心理社会疾病、功能运动能力及健康相关生活质量(HRQL)的影响。
一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验,对结果评估和数据分析进行盲法处理。
一家三级医疗呼吸科服务机构。
40例患者(平均年龄65±8岁[±标准差]),患有重度慢性气流受限(第1秒用力呼气容积[FEV(1)]为35±13%)且无呼吸衰竭(动脉血氧分压[Pao(2)]为72±9 mmHg;动脉血二氧化碳分压[Paco(2)]为42±5 mmHg),被随机分为对照组或肺康复组(PRG)。
为期16周的肺康复,包括呼吸再训练和运动。
在基线和16周时,我们使用两份问卷(米隆行为健康量表[MBHI]和症状自评量表修订版[SCL - 90 - R])评估心理社会疾病,并使用慢性呼吸问卷(CRQ)测量6分钟步行距离(6WMD)和健康相关生活质量(HRQL)。
我们发现肺康复组在以下MBHI领域存在优势:内向、有力和敏感的人格类型(均p≤0.05)以及慢性紧张(p≤0.01)。SCL - 90 - R的抑郁、敌意、总体严重程度、阳性症状痛苦指数(均p≤0.01)、躯体化、焦虑、精神质和阳性症状(均p≤0.05)领域的结果也有利于肺康复组。我们还发现两组在6分钟步行距离(85米;p < 0.01)以及慢性呼吸问卷的两个领域存在统计学和临床显著差异:呼吸困难(1.0;p < 0.01)和掌控感(0.6;p < 0.05)。慢性呼吸问卷的另外两个领域也显示出有利于肺康复组的强烈趋势:疲劳和情绪功能均为0.7(最小重要差异为0.5)。
即使未进行特定的心理干预,肺康复也可能降低COPD患者的心理社会疾病。本研究结果还证实了肺康复对功能运动能力和健康相关生活质量的积极影响。