Suppr超能文献

社区获得性肺炎中的严重脓毒症:何时发生,全身炎症反应综合征标准能否帮助预测病程?

Severe sepsis in community-acquired pneumonia: when does it happen, and do systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria help predict course?

作者信息

Dremsizov Tony, Clermont Gilles, Kellum John A, Kalassian Kenneth G, Fine Michael J, Angus Derek C

机构信息

606 Scaife Hall, the CRISMA Laboratory, Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.

出版信息

Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):968-78. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.968.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Most natural history studies of severe sepsis are limited to ICU populations. We describe the onset and timing of severe sepsis during the hospital course for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We also determine the ability of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and other proposed risk stratification scores measured at emergency department (ED) presentation to predict progression to severe sepsis, septic shock, or death.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective observational outcome study from the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT).

SETTING

Four academic medical centers in the United States and Canada between October 1991 and March 1994.

PARTICIPANTS

The 1,339 patients hospitalized for CAP in the PORT study cohort, and a random subset of 686 patients for whom we had information for SIRS criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

All subjects had infection (CAP). Severe sepsis was defined as new-onset acute organ dysfunction in this cohort, using consensus criteria. Severe sepsis developed in one half of the patients (n = 639, 48%), nonpulmonary organ dysfunction developed in 520 patients (39%), and septic shock developed in 61 subjects (4.5%). Severe sepsis and septic shock were present at ED presentation in 457 patients (71% of severe sepsis cases) and 27 patients (44% of septic shock cases), respectively. While SIRS was common at presentation (82% of the subset of 686 had two SIRS criteria), it was not associated with increased odds for progression to severe sepsis (odds ratios [ORs], 0.65 and 0.89 for two or more SIRS criteria and three or more SIRS criteria, respectively), septic shock (ORs, 0.80 and 0.55), or death (ORs, 0.65 and 0.39), with poor discrimination (all receiver operating characteristic [ROC] areas under the curve < 0.5). The pneumonia severity index was associated with severe sepsis (p < 0.001) with moderate discrimination (ROC, 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe sepsis is common in hospitalized CAP patients, occurring early in the hospital course. SIRS criteria do not appear to be useful predictors for progression to severe sepsis in CAP.

摘要

研究目的

大多数关于严重脓毒症的自然史研究仅限于重症监护病房(ICU)患者群体。我们描述了社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者在住院期间严重脓毒症的发病情况和时间。我们还确定了在急诊科(ED)就诊时测量的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)及其他建议的风险分层评分预测进展为严重脓毒症、感染性休克或死亡的能力。

设计

对肺炎患者预后研究团队(PORT)的一项前瞻性观察性结局研究进行回顾性分析。

地点

1991年10月至1994年3月期间在美国和加拿大的四个学术医疗中心。

参与者

PORT研究队列中1339例因CAP住院的患者,以及686例我们掌握SIRS标准信息的随机子集患者。

干预措施

无。

测量与结果

所有受试者均患有感染(CAP)。在该队列中,严重脓毒症采用共识标准定义为新发急性器官功能障碍。一半患者(n = 639,48%)发生严重脓毒症,520例患者(39%)发生非肺部器官功能障碍,61例患者(4.5%)发生感染性休克。在ED就诊时,分别有457例患者(占严重脓毒症病例的71%)和27例患者(占感染性休克病例的44%)存在严重脓毒症和感染性休克。虽然SIRS在就诊时很常见(686例子集中82%有两条SIRS标准),但它与进展为严重脓毒症(两条或更多SIRS标准的比值比[ORs]分别为0.65和0.89,三条或更多SIRS标准的ORs分别为0.80和0.55)、感染性休克(ORs分别为0.80和0.55)或死亡(ORs分别为0.65和0.39)的几率增加无关,且鉴别能力较差(所有曲线下面积<0.5)。肺炎严重指数与严重脓毒症相关(p < 0.001),鉴别能力中等(ROC为0.63)。

结论

严重脓毒症在CAP住院患者中很常见,发生在住院早期。SIRS标准似乎不是CAP进展为严重脓毒症的有用预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验