Cheson Bruce D, Greenberg Peter L, Bennett John M, Lowenberg Bob, Wijermans Pierre W, Nimer Stephen D, Pinto Antonio, Beran Miloslav, de Witte Theo M, Stone Richard M, Mittelman Moshe, Sanz Guillermo F, Gore Steven D, Schiffer Charles A, Kantarjian Hagop
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Blood. 2006 Jul 15;108(2):419-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are heterogeneous with respect to clinical characteristics, pathologic features, and cytogenetic abnormalities. This heterogeneity is a challenge for evaluating response to treatment. Therapeutic trials in MDS have used various criteria to assess results, making cross-study comparisons problematic. In 2000, an International Working Group (IWG) proposed standardized response criteria for evaluating clinically significant responses in MDS. These criteria included measures of alteration in the natural history of disease, hematologic improvement, cytogenetic response, and improvement in health-related quality of life. The relevance of the response criteria has now been validated prospectively in MDS clinical trials, and they have gained acceptance in research studies and in clinical practice. Because limitations of the IWG criteria have surfaced, based on practical and reported experience, some modifications were warranted. In this report, we present recommendations for revisions of some of the initial criteria.
骨髓增生异常综合征(MDSs)在临床特征、病理特征和细胞遗传学异常方面具有异质性。这种异质性对评估治疗反应构成挑战。MDS的治疗试验采用了各种标准来评估结果,这使得跨研究比较存在问题。2000年,一个国际工作组(IWG)提出了用于评估MDS中具有临床意义反应的标准化反应标准。这些标准包括疾病自然史改变的测量、血液学改善、细胞遗传学反应以及健康相关生活质量的改善。反应标准的相关性现已在前瞻性MDS临床试验中得到验证,并且它们已在研究和临床实践中获得认可。由于基于实际和报告的经验,IWG标准的局限性已经显现,因此有必要进行一些修改。在本报告中,我们提出了对一些初始标准进行修订的建议。