Suppr超能文献

临床试验中修订 MDS 患者 IWG 2018 血液学反应标准的建议。

Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials.

机构信息

Medical Clinic and Policlinic 1, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

European Myelodysplastic Syndromes Cooperative Group (EMSCO Group), Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Blood. 2019 Mar 7;133(10):1020-1030. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-857102. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

Abstract

The heterogeneity of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) has made evaluating patient response to treatment challenging. In 2006, the International Working Group (IWG) proposed a revision to previously published standardized response criteria (IWG 2000) for uniformly evaluating clinical responses in MDSs. These IWG 2006 criteria have been used prospectively in many clinical trials in MDSs, but proved challenging in several of them, especially for the evaluation of erythroid response. In this report, we provide rationale for modifications (IWG 2018) of these recommendations, mainly for "hematological improvement" criteria used for lower-risk MDSs, based on recent practical and reported experience in clinical trials. Most suggestions relate to erythroid response assessment, which are refined in an overall more stringent manner. Two major proposed changes are the differentiation between "procedures" and "criteria" for hematologic improvement-erythroid assessment and a new categorization of transfusion-burden subgroups.

摘要

骨髓增生异常综合征 (MDS) 的异质性使得评估患者对治疗的反应变得具有挑战性。2006 年,国际工作组 (IWG) 对之前发表的标准化反应标准 (IWG 2000) 进行了修订,以便在 MDS 中统一评估临床反应。这些 IWG 2006 标准已在 MDS 的许多临床试验中前瞻性使用,但在其中一些临床试验中证明具有挑战性,尤其是在评估红细胞反应方面。在本报告中,我们根据临床试验中的近期实践和报告经验,为这些建议的修改(IWG 2018)提供了理由,主要是针对低危 MDS 所用的“血液学改善”标准。大多数建议都与红细胞反应评估有关,这些建议在整体上更加严格。两个主要的建议变化是区分用于红细胞评估的血液学改善的“程序”和“标准”,以及输血负担亚组的新分类。

相似文献

1
Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials.
Blood. 2019 Mar 7;133(10):1020-1030. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-857102. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
Meaningful response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes.
Br J Haematol. 2022 Mar;196(5):1137-1148. doi: 10.1111/bjh.17838. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
4
Speaking a common language in MDS/MPNs.
Blood. 2015 Mar 19;125(12):1849-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-02-626473.
6
Evolution of Therapeutic Benefit Measurement Criteria in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms.
Cancer J. 2023;29(3):203-211. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000666.
7
Response assessments in low-risk and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
Semin Oncol. 2005 Aug;32(4 Suppl 5):S11-5. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.016.

引用本文的文献

5
Prospective performance of the IWG-2023 criteria and IPSS-M in a phase 2 trial of guadecitabine for higher-risk MDS or CMML.
Blood Neoplasia. 2024 Mar 29;1(2):100008. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100008. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Real-life experience of luspatercept in transfusion-dependent lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients.
Br J Haematol. 2025 Jul;207(1):101-109. doi: 10.1111/bjh.20102. Epub 2025 May 5.
9

本文引用的文献

8
Prevalence, severity and correlates of fatigue in newly diagnosed patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Br J Haematol. 2015 Feb;168(3):361-70. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13138. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
9
Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet.
Blood. 2013 Oct 24;122(17):2943-64. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-492884. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
10
Quality of life and physicians' perception in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Am J Blood Res. 2012;2(2):136-47. Epub 2012 May 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验