Rashidi Arash, Rahman Mahboob, Wright Jackson T
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-5401, USA.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2006 May;15(3):303-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mnh.0000222699.37830.c7.
To review recent data and guidelines on selecting the initial antihypertensive drug.
The main driver of benefit from blood pressure-lowering therapy is blood pressure reduction, and there is little evidence supporting additional drug class-specific benefits in primary prevention of major cardiovascular outcomes. The results also confirm that in the patient with uncomplicated hypertension as well as in those patients with diabetes without nephropathy, initial therapy with 'newer therapies' (i.e. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers) are effective, but not more effective than thiazide diuretics, at reducing stroke, coronary heart disease, morbidity or mortality, or all-cause mortality.
While compelling indications may exist for specific drug classes in those with specific target organ damage (i.e. heart failure, renal insufficiency, and coronary artery disease), thiazide diuretics remain unsurpassed in lowering blood pressure and in preventing hypertension-related clinical outcomes. Despite a more favorable metabolic profile, alpha-blockers are less effective in preventing cardiovascular disease, especially heart failure and stroke. Calcium channel blockers produce a similar reduction in blood pressure and cardiovascular disease outcomes compared with thiazide-type diuretics, although they are consistently less effective in preventing heart failure. In the absence of heart failure or renal disease, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have shown little advantage in clinical trials over diuretics in preventing cardiovascular disease and are not indicated as an initial therapy in Blacks.
回顾近期关于选择初始抗高血压药物的数据和指南。
降压治疗获益的主要驱动因素是血压降低,几乎没有证据支持在主要心血管结局的一级预防中特定药物类别有额外的益处。结果还证实,对于单纯性高血压患者以及无肾病的糖尿病患者,采用“新型疗法”(即血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、钙通道阻滞剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)进行初始治疗在降低中风、冠心病、发病率或死亡率或全因死亡率方面是有效的,但并不比噻嗪类利尿剂更有效。
虽然对于有特定靶器官损害(即心力衰竭、肾功能不全和冠状动脉疾病)的患者,特定药物类别可能有令人信服的指征,但噻嗪类利尿剂在降低血压和预防高血压相关临床结局方面仍然是无与伦比的。尽管α受体阻滞剂的代谢谱更有利,但在预防心血管疾病,尤其是心力衰竭和中风方面效果较差。与噻嗪类利尿剂相比,钙通道阻滞剂在降低血压和心血管疾病结局方面效果相似,尽管它们在预防心力衰竭方面一直效果较差。在没有心力衰竭或肾脏疾病的情况下,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在预防心血管疾病的临床试验中相对于利尿剂几乎没有显示出优势,并且不被推荐作为黑人的初始治疗药物。