Patel Chetan D, Nadig Murali R, Kurien Sumodh, Barai Sukanta, Narang Rajeev, Malhotra Arun
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Nucl Med Commun. 2006 May;27(5):425-9. doi: 10.1097/00006231-200605000-00003.
Rest gated 201Tl images are considered to be of poor count statistics due to lower energy and low photon flux of 201Tl in addition to increased attenuation and low dose that can be administered. We compared the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end diastolic (EDV) and end systolic volume (ESV) obtained on 4 h gated rest 201Tl myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with those obtained by two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D ECHO) in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Eighty-two consecutive patients who underwent gated 201Tl stress-rest myocardial perfusion SPECT and 2-D ECHO were studied. The gated thallium images were processed with Siemens e-soft autocardiac processor and LVEF, EDV and ESV were evaluated using Emory Cardiac Toolbox. The same parameters were also assessed on the 2-D ECHO using the modified Simpson method for comparison.
Out of 82 rest gated images, one study was excluded because of poor count statistics. In 81 (99%) patients there was good linear correlation with 2-D ECHO values and rest gated 201Tl SPECT images for EDV, ESV and LVEF. Pearson's correlation co-efficient (r value) for EDV, ESV and LVEF between the two methods was 0.78, 0.79 and 0.88, respectively. A Bland-Altman plot showed close agreement with LVEF but not for EDV and ESV.
These results suggest that the 4 h rest gated 201Tl study gives a reliable value for the LVEF compared to 2-D ECHO and can be used in routine clinical practice.
静息门控201铊图像被认为计数统计较差,这是由于201铊能量较低、光子通量低,此外还存在衰减增加以及可给予的低剂量等因素。我们比较了已知或疑似冠心病(CAD)患者在4小时门控静息201铊心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)上获得的左心室射血分数(LVEF)、舒张末期容积(EDV)和收缩末期容积(ESV)与二维超声心动图(2 - D ECHO)获得的这些参数。
对82例连续接受门控201铊负荷 - 静息心肌灌注SPECT和2 - D ECHO检查的患者进行研究。门控铊图像用西门子e - soft自动心脏处理器处理,使用埃默里心脏工具箱评估LVEF、EDV和ESV。同样的参数也在2 - D ECHO上使用改良辛普森法进行评估以作比较。
在82幅静息门控图像中,有1项研究因计数统计差而被排除。在81例(99%)患者中,EDV、ESV和LVEF的静息门控201铊SPECT图像与2 - D ECHO值具有良好的线性相关性。两种方法之间EDV、ESV和LVEF的皮尔逊相关系数(r值)分别为0.78、0.79和0.88。布兰德 - 奥特曼图显示LVEF一致性良好,但EDV和ESV并非如此。
这些结果表明,与2 - D ECHO相比,4小时静息门控201铊研究可得出可靠的LVEF值,可用于常规临床实践。