Suppr超能文献

Tl-201 门控 SPECT 左心室射血分数评估:与超声心动图的比较。

Left ventricular ejection fraction assessment by Tl-201 gated SPECT: a comparison with echocardiography.

机构信息

The Heart Institute, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2010 Mar;33(3):E56-62. doi: 10.1002/clc.20577.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies including only a limited number of patients have compared left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by 2-dimensional echocardiography (2-DE) and electrocardiography-gated Tl-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

HYPOTHESIS

LVEF assessment by Tl-201 gated spect is comparable with LVEF assessed by 2-DE in two different echocardiographic laboratories.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (n = 402) underwent Tl-201 gated SPECT in the same laboratory and 2-DE in 2 different laboratories. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the study laboratory: group 1, at the tertiary hospital and group 2, at a community laboratory.

RESULTS

LVEF evaluations were similar (mean LVEF: 50.73% +/- 11.67% by 2-DE vs 50.11% +/- 11.41% by SPECT in group 1 and 57.27% +/- 7.44% by 2-DE vs 57.41% +/- 8.37% by SPECT in group 2). All LVEF measurements were highly correlated (r = 0.7, P<.001). Baseline characteristics differed between the groups, with a higher prevalence of past myocardial infarction in the in-hospital vs the community echo group (46.7% vs 22.2%, P<.01), resulting in a higher LVEF in the latter, both by 2-DE (mean 50.7% +/- 11.7% vs 57.3% +/- 7.4%, P<.01) and SPECT (50.1% +/- 11.4% vs 57.4% +/- 8.4%, P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Tl-201 gated SPECT is a reliable clinical tool for LVEF assessment, with good correlation when compared to 2-DE. It may be routinely used as an alternative for patients with poor acoustic visualization and should be performed systematically in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging with Tl-201.

摘要

背景

仅有少数患者参与的研究比较了二维超声心动图(2-DE)和心电图门控 Tl-201 单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)评估的左心室射血分数(LVEF)。

假说

Tl-201 门控 SPECT 评估的 LVEF 与在两个不同超声心动图实验室评估的 2-DE 相似。

材料和方法

患者(n=402)在同一家实验室接受 Tl-201 门控 SPECT 检查,在两家不同的实验室接受 2-DE 检查。根据研究实验室,患者被分为两组:第 1 组在三级医院,第 2 组在社区实验室。

结果

LVEF 评估结果相似(第 1 组 2-DE 评估的平均 LVEF 为 50.73% +/- 11.67%,SPECT 评估的为 50.11% +/- 11.41%;第 2 组 2-DE 评估的平均 LVEF 为 57.27% +/- 7.44%,SPECT 评估的为 57.41% +/- 8.37%)。所有 LVEF 测量值高度相关(r=0.7,P<.001)。两组间的基线特征不同,院内超声心动图组与社区超声心动图组相比,既往心肌梗死的发生率更高(46.7% vs 22.2%,P<.01),这导致后者的 LVEF 更高,2-DE(平均 50.7% +/- 11.7% vs 57.3% +/- 7.4%,P<.01)和 SPECT(50.1% +/- 11.4% vs 57.4% +/- 8.4%,P<.01)均如此。

结论

Tl-201 门控 SPECT 是评估 LVEF 的可靠临床工具,与 2-DE 相比具有良好的相关性。它可以作为声学可视化不良患者的常规替代方法,并且应在接受 Tl-201 心肌灌注成像的患者中系统地进行。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Stress-induced ST-segment elevation in patients without prior Q-wave myocardial infarction.无既往Q波心肌梗死患者的应激性ST段抬高
J Electrocardiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;41(4):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 May 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验