Liu Yao-Chi, Shen Chen-Yang, Wu Hurng-Sheng, Hsieh Tsai-Yuan, Chan De-Chuan, Chen Cheng-Jueng, Yu Jyh-Cherng, Yu Cheng-Ping, Harn Horng-Jyh, Chen Peng-Jen, Hsieh Chung-Bao, Chen Teng-Wei, Hsu Huan-Mieng
Division of General Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, No. 325, Sec 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Taipei, Taiwan, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr 14;12(14):2168-73. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i14.2168.
To study the role of CDH1/E-cadherin (E-cad) gene alteration profiles including mutation, loss of heterozygosity (LOH), promoter polymorphism and hypermethylation in mechanisms of CDH1 inactivation in gastric carcinoma (GC).
Specimens were collected surgically from 70 patients with GC. Allelotyping PCR and detection of LOH, denaturing high pressure liquid chromatography and DNA sequencing, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, methylation specific PCR, and immunohistochemical staining were used.
Promoter polymorphism was not a major mechanism of E-cad inactivation. Only one truncating mutation was found in a diffuse type tumor (3%). Both LOH and promoter hypermethylation were major mechanisms of E-cad inactivation, but interestingly, there was a negative association between the fraction of allelic loss (LOH) in tumors and hypermethylation of CDH1. Therefore LOH and hypermethylation were two different tumorigenic pathways involved in GC.
Given the findings that somatic mutation was extremely low and the relationship between LOH and hypermethylation was inverse, any two combinations of these three factors cannot fulfill the classical two-hit hypothesis of CDH1 inactivation. Thus, other mechanisms operating at the transcriptional level or at the post-translational level might be required to induce E-cadherin inactivation.
研究CDH1/E-钙黏蛋白(E-cad)基因改变谱,包括突变、杂合性缺失(LOH)、启动子多态性和高甲基化在胃癌(GC)中CDH1失活机制中的作用。
手术采集70例GC患者的标本。采用等位基因分型PCR和LOH检测、变性高效液相色谱和DNA测序、限制性片段长度多态性分析、甲基化特异性PCR以及免疫组织化学染色。
启动子多态性不是E-cad失活的主要机制。仅在1例弥漫型肿瘤中发现1个截短突变(3%)。LOH和启动子高甲基化均为E-cad失活的主要机制,但有趣的是,肿瘤中等位基因缺失(LOH)比例与CDH1高甲基化之间呈负相关。因此,LOH和高甲基化是GC中涉及的两种不同的致瘤途径。
鉴于体细胞突变极低以及LOH与高甲基化之间呈负相关这一发现,这三个因素中的任何两种组合都无法满足CDH1失活的经典双打击假说。因此,可能需要在转录水平或翻译后水平起作用的其他机制来诱导E-钙黏蛋白失活。