Greenwald Jeffrey L, Rich Catherine A, Bessega Samantha, Posner Michael A, Maeda Jared Lane, Skolnik Paul R
Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Apr;81(4):452-8. doi: 10.4065/81.4.452.
To assess the proportion of hospitalized patients who tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by a routine inpatient testing service, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who might not have been identified had routine testing not been offered.
In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of patients who tested HIV positive by the inpatient testing service between 1999 and 2003 were compared with the medical records of inpatients who tested HIV negative by the inpatient testing service and the medical records of patients who tested HIV positive in ambulatory settings. We compared HIV risk factors, discharge diagnoses, CD4 cell counts, and HIV RNA concentrations.
A total of 243 patients participated in this study: 81 patients who tested HIV positive and 81 who tested HIV negative by the inpatient testing service, and 81 patients who tested HIV positive in ambulatory settings. Both HIV-positive inpatients and HIV-positive outpatients had similar frequencies of HIV risk factors (46% vs 43%; P=.75). Both groups differed significantly from HIV-negative inpatients (4%; P<.001). Comparing HIV-positive inpatients with HIV-positive outpatients, CD4 cell counts were lower (196 vs 371 cells/mm3; P<.001), and HIV RNA levels were higher (4.61 vs 4.09 Iog, HIV RNA; P=.001). At diagnosis, 64 HIV-positive inpatients (79%) met criteria for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome compared with 21 HIV-positive outpatients (26%) (P<.001).
Patients who tested HIV positive through inpatient testing have more advanced disease than those identified as outpatients. Half of these patients would not have been identified had testing not been routinely offered. Routine inpatient HIV testing offers an important opportunity to identify patients with HIV infection.
评估按照疾病控制与预防中心的建议,通过常规住院检测服务检测出人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)呈阳性的住院患者比例,若未提供常规检测,这些患者可能无法被识别。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,将1999年至2003年间通过住院检测服务检测出HIV呈阳性的患者的病历,与通过住院检测服务检测出HIV呈阴性的住院患者的病历以及在门诊环境中检测出HIV呈阳性的患者的病历进行比较。我们比较了HIV风险因素、出院诊断、CD4细胞计数和HIV RNA浓度。
共有243名患者参与了本研究:81名通过住院检测服务检测出HIV呈阳性的患者、81名通过住院检测服务检测出HIV呈阴性的患者以及81名在门诊环境中检测出HIV呈阳性的患者。HIV阳性住院患者和HIV阳性门诊患者的HIV风险因素频率相似(46%对43%;P = 0.75)。这两组与HIV阴性住院患者均有显著差异(4%;P < 0.001)。将HIV阳性住院患者与HIV阳性门诊患者进行比较,CD4细胞计数较低(196对371个细胞/mm³;P < 0.001),HIV RNA水平较高(4.61对4.09 log,HIV RNA;P = 0.001)。在诊断时,64名HIV阳性住院患者(79%)符合获得性免疫缺陷综合征标准,而21名HIV阳性门诊患者(26%)符合该标准(P < 0.001)。
通过住院检测HIV呈阳性的患者比门诊确诊的患者病情更严重。若未进行常规检测,这些患者中有一半将无法被识别。常规住院HIV检测为识别HIV感染患者提供了重要机会。