Eaves Lindon J
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;9(1):1-8. doi: 10.1375/183242706776403073.
Recent studies have claimed to detect interaction between candidate genes and specific environmental factors (Genotype x Environment interaction, G x E) in susceptibility to psychiatric disorder. The objective of the present study was to examine possible artifacts that could explain widely publicized findings. The additive effects of candidate genes and measured environment on liability to disorder were simulated under a model that allowed for mixture of distributions in liability conditional on genotype and environment. Simulated liabilities were dichotomized at a threshold value to reflect diagnosis of disorder. Multiple blocks of simulated data were analyzed by standard statistical methods to test for the main effects and interactions of genes and environment on outcome. The main outcome of this study was simulated liabilities and diagnoses of major depression and antisocial behavior. Analysis of the dichotomized data by logistic regression frequently detected significant G x E interaction even though none was present for liability. There is therefore reason to question the biological significance of published findings.
最近的研究声称已检测到候选基因与特定环境因素之间在精神疾病易感性方面的相互作用(基因与环境相互作用,G×E)。本研究的目的是检验可能解释广为宣传的研究结果的假象。在一个允许根据基因型和环境对易感性分布进行混合的模型下,模拟了候选基因和测量环境对疾病易感性的累加效应。将模拟的易感性在一个阈值处进行二分,以反映疾病诊断。通过标准统计方法对多个模拟数据块进行分析,以检验基因和环境对结果的主效应和相互作用。本研究的主要结果是模拟的易感性以及重度抑郁和反社会行为的诊断。通过逻辑回归对二分数据进行分析时,即使易感性不存在G×E相互作用,也经常检测到显著的G×E相互作用。因此,有理由质疑已发表研究结果的生物学意义。