• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西澳大利亚家族性癌症项目的经济学评估:家族性腺瘤性息肉病和遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的预测性基因检测

Economic evaluation of the familial cancer programme in Western Australia: predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma.

作者信息

Breheny N, Geelhoed E, Goldblatt J, Ee H, O'Leary P

机构信息

Department of Health, Government of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Community Genet. 2006;9(2):98-106. doi: 10.1159/000091487.

DOI:10.1159/000091487
PMID:16612060
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate costs and outcomes of genetic testing for familial colorectal cancer through services provided by Genetic Services of Western Australia (GSWA).

METHODS

Costs and outcomes of predictive DNA-based testing for inherited colorectal cancers (CRC) were assessed, specifically for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary non-polyposis CRC (HNPCC) using a decision-analysis model. Costs were assigned according to standards of care in Western Australia (WA). Cancer risks and the efficacy of surveillance on long-term outcomes were derived from the published literature.

RESULTS

The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing was compared in first-degree relatives of known mutation carriers who have a 50% risk of carrying the mutated gene (intervention group) to individuals with the same risk but who do not undergo a genetic test (control subjects). Compared with control subjects undergoing the same high-level surveillance and surgery, the FAP and HNPCC intervention groups provided total savings of 13,390 US dollars and 14,783-15,460 per person (males-females), respectively. HPNCC mutation carriers also gained 1 CRC-free year. Compared to control subjects having only population surveillance, individuals in the FAP intervention group delayed the onset of CRC by 40 years for a net cost of 9,042 US dollars. Individuals in the HNPCC intervention group delayed the onset of CRC by 8 years at a net cost of 12,141 US dollars for males and 12,596 US dollars for females.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing for familial CRC in WA allows targeted surveillance for mutation carriers, which ensures the efficient use of resources and reduces cancer-related morbidity, if clinical recommendations for intervention are adopted.

摘要

目的

通过西澳大利亚基因服务机构(GSWA)提供的服务,评估家族性结直肠癌基因检测的成本和结果。

方法

使用决策分析模型评估基于DNA的遗传性结直肠癌(CRC)预测性检测的成本和结果,特别是针对家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)和遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)。成本根据西澳大利亚(WA)的护理标准进行分配。癌症风险和监测对长期结果的疗效来自已发表的文献。

结果

将已知突变携带者的一级亲属(携带突变基因风险为50%)(干预组)与具有相同风险但未接受基因检测的个体(对照受试者)进行基因检测的成本效益比较。与接受相同高水平监测和手术的对照受试者相比,FAP和HNPCC干预组每人分别节省了13,390美元和14,783 - 15,460美元(男性 - 女性)。HPNCC突变携带者还多获得了1年无CRC的时间。与仅进行人群监测的对照受试者相比,FAP干预组的个体将CRC发病推迟了40年,净成本为9,042美元。HNPCC干预组的男性个体将CRC发病推迟了8年,净成本为12,141美元,女性为12,596美元。

结论

在西澳大利亚,对家族性CRC进行基因检测可对突变携带者进行有针对性的监测,如果采用临床干预建议,可确保资源的有效利用并降低癌症相关的发病率。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of the familial cancer programme in Western Australia: predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma.西澳大利亚家族性癌症项目的经济学评估:家族性腺瘤性息肉病和遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的预测性基因检测
Community Genet. 2006;9(2):98-106. doi: 10.1159/000091487.
2
[Hereditary colorectal carcinoma: predictive diagnosis and genetic counseling].[遗传性结直肠癌:预测性诊断与遗传咨询]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2001 Mar 22;90(12):490-6.
3
[Familial colorectal cancer].[家族性结直肠癌]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2006 Jun 12;168(24):2369-73.
4
Hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: familial adenomatous polyposis and lynch syndrome.遗传性结直肠癌综合征:家族性腺瘤性息肉病和林奇综合征。
Surg Clin North Am. 2008 Aug;88(4):819-44, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2008.04.012.
5
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a review of clinical, genetic and therapeutic aspects.家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)与遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC):临床、遗传及治疗方面的综述
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1997 Apr 19;127(16):682-90.
6
Inherited susceptibility to colorectal cancer.遗传性结直肠癌易感性
Annu Rev Med. 2005;56:539-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.56.061704.135235.
7
Challenges in the diagnosis and management of Lynch Syndrome in an Indigenous family living in a remote West Australian community.西澳大利亚偏远社区一个原住民家庭中林奇综合征诊断与管理面临的挑战。
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(4):1836. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
8
The use of genetic testing in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: genetic testing in HNPCC, (A)FAP and MAP.遗传性结直肠癌综合征中基因检测的应用:遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)、(非典型)家族性腺瘤性息肉病((A)FAP)和微卫星高度不稳定型结直肠癌(MAP)中的基因检测
Clin Genet. 2007 Dec;72(6):562-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00912.x. Epub 2007 Oct 7.
9
Simple and complex genetics of colorectal cancer susceptibility.结直肠癌易感性的简单与复杂遗传学
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2004 Aug 15;129C(1):35-43. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30023.
10
Awareness of genetic testing for colorectal cancer predisposition among specialists in gastroenterology.胃肠病学专家对结直肠癌易感性基因检测的认知
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Mar;97(3):729-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05556.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer prevention in cancer predisposition syndromes: A protocol for testing the feasibility of building a hereditary cancer research registry and nurse navigator follow up model.癌症易感性综合征中的癌症预防:建立遗传性癌症研究登记处和护士导航员随访模型的可行性测试方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0279317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279317. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of free cancer predisposition cascade genetic testing on uptake in Singapore.免费癌症遗传易感性连锁基因检测对新加坡检测接受率的影响。
NPJ Genom Med. 2019 Sep 13;4:22. doi: 10.1038/s41525-019-0096-5. eCollection 2019.
3
Costs and outcomes of Lynch syndrome screening in the Australian colorectal cancer population.
澳大利亚结直肠癌人群中林奇综合征筛查的成本和结果。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1737-1744. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14154. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些林奇综合征筛查方案可以在“现实世界”中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1131-1144. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.244. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
Is there evidence that we should screen the general population for Lynch syndrome with genetic testing? A systematic review.是否有证据表明我们应该通过基因检测对普通人群进行林奇综合征筛查?一项系统评价。
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2017 Feb 20;10:49-60. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S123808. eCollection 2017.
6
Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.选择不接受遗传性结直肠癌综合征的预测性基因检测:拓展我们对拒绝者及拒绝行为的理解
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):583-594. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
Hereditary colorectal cancer registries in Canada: report from the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada consensus meeting; Montreal, Quebec; October 28, 2011.加拿大遗传性结直肠癌登记处:来自加拿大结直肠癌协会共识会议的报告;魁北克省蒙特利尔;2011 年 10 月 28 日。
Curr Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(5):273-8. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1566.
8
Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore.对突变携带者一级亲属进行预测性基因检测,是预防新加坡遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的一种具有成本效益的策略。
Fam Cancer. 2012 Jun;11(2):279-89. doi: 10.1007/s10689-012-9513-y.
9
Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.公共卫生框架下的基因检测与常见疾病:如何评估相关性及可能性。欧洲人类遗传学学会关于基因检测与常见疾病建议的背景文件
Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S6-44. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.249.
10
EGAPP supplementary evidence review: DNA testing strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome.EGAPP补充证据审查:旨在降低林奇综合征发病率和死亡率的DNA检测策略
Genet Med. 2009 Jan;11(1):42-65. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31818fa2db.