• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择不接受遗传性结直肠癌综合征的预测性基因检测:拓展我们对拒绝者及拒绝行为的理解

Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.

作者信息

Keogh Louise A, Niven Heather, Rutstein Alison, Flander Louisa, Gaff Clara, Jenkins Mark

机构信息

Gender and Women's Health Unit, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):583-594. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0
PMID:28197815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6057776/
Abstract

While medical research continues to investigate the genetic basis of cancer, and personalised prevention gains momentum, little research has been conducted with the individuals who decline predictive genetic testing for cancer. We recruited individuals who had been offered genetic testing for Lynch syndrome or bi-allelic MUTYH mutations due to their participation in a large, population-based, Australia-wide colorectal cancer study. Thirty-three individuals in mutation-carrying families, unaffected by cancer, who had actively or passively declined testing at one of four decision-making points, took part in a qualitative interview about their decision. Data analysis revealed a typology of 'decliners': (1) uninformed about genetic testing; (2) a weak intention to undergo genetic testing; (3) conditionally declining; and (4) unconditionally declining testing. In this population we found substantial barriers to achieving the benefits promised by predictive genetic testing; a lack of knowledge of the availability of genetic testing; a lack of trust in genetic test information; a desire to see a stronger benefit from genetic testing before proceeding; and a sense that there may be more negative than positive outcomes from genetic testing. These discourses must be addressed if medical research on the genetic basis of cancer continues to be funded, and personalised prevention of cancer continues to be recommended by experts.

摘要

尽管医学研究仍在继续探究癌症的遗传基础,且个性化预防正渐趋流行,但针对那些拒绝进行癌症预测性基因检测的个体,所开展的研究却寥寥无几。我们招募了一些个体,他们因参与一项基于澳大利亚全国范围的大型人群结直肠癌研究,而被提供了针对林奇综合征或双等位基因MUTYH突变的基因检测。在携带突变的家庭中,有33名未患癌症的个体,他们在四个决策点中的某一个点上主动或被动地拒绝了检测,并参与了关于其决策的定性访谈。数据分析揭示了“拒绝者”的一种类型划分:(1)对基因检测不知情;(2)进行基因检测的意愿淡薄;(3)有条件地拒绝;以及(4)无条件地拒绝检测。在这一人群中,我们发现要实现预测性基因检测所承诺的益处存在诸多重大障碍;对基因检测的可获得性缺乏了解;对基因检测信息缺乏信任;希望在进行检测之前看到基因检测带来更明显的益处;以及感觉基因检测的负面结果可能多于正面结果。如果癌症遗传基础的医学研究继续获得资助,且专家继续推荐癌症的个性化预防,那么这些观点必须得到解决。

相似文献

1
Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.选择不接受遗传性结直肠癌综合征的预测性基因检测:拓展我们对拒绝者及拒绝行为的理解
J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;40(4):583-594. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
2
Discussions about predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: the role of health professionals and families in decisions to decline.关于林奇综合征预测性基因检测的讨论:健康专业人员和家庭在拒绝检测决定中的作用。
Fam Cancer. 2018 Oct;17(4):547-555. doi: 10.1007/s10689-018-0078-2.
3
Contribution of bi-allelic germline MUTYH mutations to early-onset and familial colorectal cancer and to low number of adenomatous polyps: case-series and literature review.种系双等位基因突变在早发性和家族性结直肠癌及低数量腺瘤性息肉中的作用:病例系列和文献复习。
Fam Cancer. 2013 Mar;12(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s10689-012-9570-2.
4
Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes.遗传性结直肠癌综合征
Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Jun;97(3):605-625. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.01.009.
5
The use of genetic testing in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: genetic testing in HNPCC, (A)FAP and MAP.遗传性结直肠癌综合征中基因检测的应用:遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)、(非典型)家族性腺瘤性息肉病((A)FAP)和微卫星高度不稳定型结直肠癌(MAP)中的基因检测
Clin Genet. 2007 Dec;72(6):562-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00912.x. Epub 2007 Oct 7.
6
Genetic testing among high-risk individuals in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌家族中高危个体的基因检测。
Br J Cancer. 2004 Feb 23;90(4):882-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601529.
7
High Prevalence of Hereditary Cancer Syndromes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Colorectal Cancer.青少年和青年结直肠癌患者中遗传性癌症综合征的高患病率。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3544-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.4503. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
8
The value of MUTYH testing in patients with early onset microsatellite stable colorectal cancer referred for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer syndrome testing.MUTYH检测在因遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌综合征检测而转诊的早发性微卫星稳定型结直肠癌患者中的价值。
Genet Test. 2007 Winter;11(4):361-5. doi: 10.1089/gte.2007.0014.
9
Lynch syndrome and MYH-associated polyposis: review and testing strategy.林奇综合征和 MYH 相关息肉病:综述与检测策略。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;45(6):488-500. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318206489c.
10
Changes in screening behaviors and attitudes toward screening from pre-test genetic counseling to post-disclosure in Lynch syndrome families.林奇综合征家族中,从预检测遗传咨询到披露后,筛查行为和对筛查的态度的变化。
Clin Genet. 2013 Mar;83(3):215-20. doi: 10.1111/cge.12091.

引用本文的文献

1
A WeChat-Based Decision Aid Intervention to Promote Informed Decision-Making for Family Members Regarding the Genetic Testing of Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于微信的决策辅助干预措施,以促进结直肠癌患者家属在基因检测方面做出明智决策:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 21;27:e60681. doi: 10.2196/60681.
2
"Uninsurable because of a genetic test": a qualitative study of consumer views about the use of genetic test results in Australian life insurance.“由于基因测试而无法投保”:一项关于澳大利亚寿险中使用基因测试结果的消费者观点的定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul;32(7):827-836. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01602-1. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Gene worlds.基因世界
Health (London). 2016 Jan;20(1):33-48. doi: 10.1177/1363459315615394. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
2
Risk of colorectal cancer for carriers of mutations in MUTYH, with and without a family history of cancer.携带 MUTYH 基因突变者的结直肠癌风险,无论是否有癌症家族史。
Gastroenterology. 2014 May;146(5):1208-11.e1-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
3
Life insurance and genetic test results: a mutation carrier's fight to achieve full cover.人寿保险与基因检测结果:突变携带者争取全额保险
Future implications of polygenic risk scores for life insurance underwriting.
多基因风险评分对人寿保险承保的未来影响。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Mar 30;9(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00407-x.
4
Preferences for Genetic Testing to Predict the Risk of Developing Hereditary Cancer: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.遗传检测预测遗传性癌症风险的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Apr;44(3):252-268. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241227425. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
5
Relatives from Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Lynch Syndrome Families Forgoing Genetic Testing: Findings from the Swiss CASCADE Cohort.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌以及林奇综合征家族的亲属放弃基因检测:瑞士级联队列研究结果
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 19;12(10):1740. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101740.
6
Motivations and Barriers to Participation in a Randomized Trial on Melanoma Genomic Risk: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.参与黑色素瘤基因组风险随机试验的动机与障碍:一项混合方法分析
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 12;12(10):1704. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101704.
7
Health professionals' views and experiences of the Australian moratorium on genetic testing and life insurance: A qualitative study.健康专业人士对澳大利亚基因检测和寿险禁令的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Nov;30(11):1262-1268. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01150-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
8
DRP1 contributes to head and neck cancer progression and induces glycolysis through modulated FOXM1/MMP12 axis.DRP1 促进头颈部癌症的进展,并通过调节 FOXM1/MMP12 轴诱导糖酵解。
Mol Oncol. 2022 Jul;16(13):2585-2606. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13212. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
9
Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.研究方案:澳大利亚遗传学与寿险暂缓—监测效果与反应(A-GLIMMER)项目。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 21;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00634-2.
10
Novel methylated DNA markers accurately discriminate Lynch syndrome associated colorectal neoplasia.新型甲基化 DNA 标志物可准确区分林奇综合征相关结直肠肿瘤。
Epigenomics. 2020 Dec;12(24):2173-2187. doi: 10.2217/epi-2020-0132. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
Med J Aust. 2013 Sep 2;199(5):363-6. doi: 10.5694/mja13.10202.
4
Perceived versus predicted risks of colorectal cancer and self-reported colonoscopies by members of mismatch repair gene mutation-carrying families who have declined genetic testing.携带错配修复基因突变的家族成员拒绝基因检测后对结直肠癌的感知风险与预测风险及自我报告的结肠镜检查情况
J Genet Couns. 2014 Feb;23(1):79-88. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9614-2. Epub 2013 Jun 9.
5
How do researchers manage genetic results in practice? The experience of the multinational Colon Cancer Family Registry.研究人员在实际操作中如何处理基因检测结果?多国结肠癌家族登记处的经验。
J Community Genet. 2014 Apr;5(2):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0148-y. Epub 2013 May 24.
6
Cancer risks for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation carriers.MLH1 和 MSH2 突变携带者的癌症风险。
Hum Mutat. 2013 Mar;34(3):490-7. doi: 10.1002/humu.22262.
7
The Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry.澳大利亚结直肠癌家族登记处。
Med J Aust. 2012 Nov 5;197(9):480-1. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11395.
8
Colorectal and other cancer risks for carriers and noncarriers from families with a DNA mismatch repair gene mutation: a prospective cohort study.携带 DNA 错配修复基因突变的家族中携带者和非携带者的结直肠癌和其他癌症风险:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 20;30(9):958-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5590. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
9
Implementing screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: summary of a public health/clinical collaborative meeting.对新诊断结直肠癌患者进行林奇综合征筛查的实施:公共卫生/临床协作会议纪要。
Genet Med. 2012 Jan;14(1):152-62. doi: 10.1038/gim.0b013e31823375ea. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
10
Predictive genetic testing and beyond: a theory of engagement.预测性基因检测及其他:一种参与理论。
J Health Psychol. 2002 Sep;7(5):491-508. doi: 10.1177/1359105302007005628.