Strassnig Martin, Stowell Keith R, First Michael B, Pincus Harold Alan
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;19(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/01.yco.0000214348.38787.d3.
While Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV provided updated definitions and diagnostic criteria for the diagnoses subsumed under the category of somatoform disorders, various nosological questions are still unresolved. We assessed current research activity on important key concepts related to nosology, validity, and reliability of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV somatoform diagnoses.
The initial Medline search for articles from 2000 through 2005 yielded a total of 912 articles. After checking for redundancy and excluding publications using other than Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV diagnostic criteria, a total of 101 articles was further reviewed. Heterogeneity of papers precluded statistical approaches; thus, a descriptive and narrative review was pursued.
It appears that applying the specific categories and criteria as proposed by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV only captures a small proportion of the phenomena of interest at the interface of medicine and psychiatry. A paradigm shift towards 'general medical/psychiatry interface disorders' in exchange for the current dichotomy of 'mind' vs. 'body' disorders, may reduce stigma associated with current diagnostic labeling, improve user acceptability, and stimulate research in this important but still fragmented clinical area that still lacks agreed-upon diagnostic definitions.
虽然《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)对躯体形式障碍类别下的诊断提供了更新的定义和诊断标准,但各种分类学问题仍未解决。我们评估了当前关于与DSM-IV躯体形式障碍诊断的分类学、效度和信度相关的重要关键概念的研究活动。
对2000年至2005年的文章进行的初步Medline检索共得到912篇文章。在检查冗余并排除使用非DSM-IV诊断标准的出版物后,共进一步审查了101篇文章。文章的异质性排除了统计方法;因此,进行了描述性和叙述性综述。
似乎应用DSM-IV提出的特定类别和标准仅涵盖了医学与精神病学交叉领域中一小部分感兴趣的现象。从当前“精神”与“身体”障碍的二分法转向“普通医学/精神病学交叉领域障碍”的范式转变,可能会减少与当前诊断标签相关的污名,提高用户接受度,并刺激在这个重要但仍支离破碎且仍缺乏公认诊断定义的临床领域的研究。