Suppr超能文献

巴氏涂片和人乳头瘤病毒检测在保守治疗的1级宫颈上皮内瘤变女性随访中的应用

Performance of Pap smear and human papilloma virus testing in the follow-up of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 managed conservatively.

作者信息

Santos André Luis Ferreira, Derchain Sophie Françoise Mauricette, Sarian Luis Otávio, Martins Marcos Roberto, Morais Sirlei Siani, Syrjänen Kari Juhani

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):444-50. doi: 10.1080/00016340600604682.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conservative management (follow-up) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) is acceptable, but evidence on performance of follow-up tools, such as Pap smear and human papilloma virus (HPV) test, is still needed.

METHODS

A cohort of 78 women with histologically confirmed CIN1, referred because of atypical squamous cell or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in their Pap smear, was enrolled between August 2000 and September 2002 and was prospectively followed-up at 6 and 12 months, until September 2003. Follow-up examinations included Pap test and Hybrid Capture II (HCII) with high-risk HPV, colposcopy, and cervical biopsies in patients with persistent abnormalities. Odds ratios and performance indicators (with 95% confidence interval) were calculated for HPV and Pap test results in detecting biopsy-confirmed CIN during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven (47%) of the women were HPV-positive at baseline. At first follow-up visit, 30 women had persistent CIN1 and one woman progressed to CIN2; 15 patients had CIN1 and one patient CIN2 at the second follow-up visit. Women with persistent CIN1 (or progression) during follow-up had a significantly higher HPV detection rate and abnormal Pap tests, compared to women with regressive disease. Cytology had a far better sensitivity in detecting CIN than HCII at the first follow-up visit (81 versus 52%, respectively), whereas both examinations had equivalent sensitivities at the second follow-up visit (69 and 56%, respectively). Cytology had a superior negative predictive value at the first follow-up visit and better positive predictive value, in addition, at the second visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Because cytological abnormalities correlated generally better with the persistence of biopsy-confirmed CIN1 in this follow-up protocol, HCII test is the second-hand option to Pap test, but the use of both Pap and HCII together seems an unnecessary waste of resources.

摘要

背景

宫颈上皮内瘤变1级(CIN1)的保守治疗(随访)是可以接受的,但仍需要有关随访工具(如巴氏涂片和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测)性能的证据。

方法

2000年8月至2002年9月招募了一组78名经组织学确诊为CIN1的女性,她们因巴氏涂片中出现非典型鳞状细胞或低级别鳞状上皮内病变而前来就诊,并在6个月和12个月时进行前瞻性随访,直至2003年9月。随访检查包括巴氏试验和高危型HPV的杂交捕获二代(HCII)检测、阴道镜检查以及对持续存在异常的患者进行宫颈活检。计算HPV和巴氏试验结果在随访期间检测活检确诊的CIN的比值比和性能指标(95%置信区间)。

结果

37名(47%)女性在基线时HPV呈阳性。在首次随访时,30名女性持续存在CIN1,1名女性进展为CIN2;在第二次随访时,15名患者为CIN1,1名患者为CIN2。与病情消退的女性相比,随访期间持续存在CIN1(或进展)的女性HPV检测率和巴氏试验异常率显著更高。在首次随访时,细胞学检测CIN的敏感性远高于HCII(分别为81%和52%),而在第二次随访时,两种检查的敏感性相当(分别为69%和56%)。细胞学在首次随访时具有更高的阴性预测值,此外,在第二次随访时具有更好的阳性预测值。

结论

在本随访方案中,由于细胞学异常与活检确诊的CIN1的持续存在总体相关性更好,因此HCII检测是巴氏试验的次选,但同时使用巴氏试验和HCII似乎是对资源的不必要浪费。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验