Güth Uwe, Wight Edward, Schötzau Andreas, Langer Igor, Dieterich Holger, Rochlitz Christoph, Herberich Linda, Holzgreve Wolfgang, Mihatsch Michael J, Singer Gad
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel (UHB), CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Hum Pathol. 2006 Mar;37(3):264-71. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.11.009.
A retrospective review was performed to investigate the prognostic significance and validity of the pathological and clinical TNM staging of noninflammatory skin involvement in breast cancer. In 128 tumors with histologically proven skin involvement and a size up to 5 cm (64% of the entire group), we distinguished clearly between group A) cases showing the classical clinical signs (cT4b) and those that do not, and between group B) carcinomas infiltrating the epidermis (pT4b) and those infiltrating only the dermis. We found only moderate concordance (kappa = 0.44) between the pathological and clinical TNM staging system. In the analysis of 80 patients with a tumor size from 2.1 to 5.0 cm, neither the appearance of classical clinical signs nor the histological diagnosis of infiltration of the epidermis was shown to be a relevant factor. In comparison to the control groups, similar clinicopathologic entities without significant differences in long-term outcome were observed. After regrouping of the patients having tumor infiltration of the papillary dermis from the control group into the study group (pT4), the study group showed a significant higher number of involved axillary lymph nodes (P = .014) and a more extensive lymph node involvement (pN3; P = .025). The combination epidermis-papillary dermis seems to be more a functional unit than the epidermis alone that is defined as the crucial and delineating factor in the TNM Classification. Our results challenge the validity of the TNM rules and recommendations concerning T4b breast cancer because it leads, in the majority of cases, to tumors of comparable extent and prognosis being placed in different categories.
进行了一项回顾性研究,以探讨乳腺癌非炎性皮肤受累的病理和临床TNM分期的预后意义及有效性。在128例经组织学证实有皮肤受累且肿瘤大小达5 cm的肿瘤中(占整个研究组的64%),我们明确区分了A组:表现出典型临床体征的病例(cT4b)和未表现出典型临床体征的病例,以及B组:浸润表皮的癌(pT4b)和仅浸润真皮的癌。我们发现病理和临床TNM分期系统之间仅有中度一致性(kappa = 0.44)。在对80例肿瘤大小为2.1至5.0 cm的患者进行分析时,无论是典型临床体征的出现还是表皮浸润的组织学诊断,均未显示为相关因素。与对照组相比,观察到具有相似临床病理特征且长期预后无显著差异的情况。将对照组中肿瘤浸润乳头真皮的患者重新分组到研究组(pT4)后,研究组显示腋窝淋巴结受累数量显著更多(P = 0.014)且淋巴结受累范围更广(pN3;P = 0.025)。表皮 - 乳头真皮的组合似乎比单独的表皮更是一个功能单元,而单独的表皮在TNM分类中被定义为关键的界定因素。我们的结果对TNM关于T4b乳腺癌的规则和建议的有效性提出了质疑,因为在大多数情况下,它导致程度和预后相当的肿瘤被归入不同类别。