Suppr超能文献

跨多项测试的项目法定向遗忘中的分离准确性。

Segregation accuracy in item-method directed forgetting across multiple tests.

作者信息

Goernert Phillip N, Widner Robert L, Otani Hajime

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Brandon University, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Psychol. 2006 May;97(Pt 2):245-58. doi: 10.1348/000712605X68870.

Abstract

Two experiments examined recall across tests following item-method directed-forgetting instructions and the varying of presentation duration of items at study. For both immediate testing (Experiment 1) and delayed testing (Experiment 2), accurate recall of remember instruction items (R-items) exceeded the accurate recall of forget instruction items (F-items). However, some F-items from study were inaccurately recalled as R-items and R-items from study as F-items. Inaccurate recall persisted across tests for both immediate and delayed recall and increased across tests for immediate recall. We view the R-item advantage in accurate recall as consistent with the account they receive more rehearsal at study than do F-items. We view inaccurate recall as reflecting the bias to report items retrieved on an immediate test lacking instructional tags as F-items. On delayed tests, items retrieved lacking instructional tags are first assessed against a criterion point on a memory-strength continuum and those with strength above the criterion reported as R-items and those below the criterion as F-items.

摘要

两项实验考察了在采用项目法定向遗忘指令以及改变学习阶段项目呈现时长的情况下,不同测试中的回忆情况。对于即时测试(实验1)和延迟测试(实验2)而言,对记住指令项目(R项目)的准确回忆均超过了对遗忘指令项目(F项目)的准确回忆。然而,学习阶段的一些F项目被错误地回忆为R项目,而学习阶段的R项目也被错误地回忆为F项目。无论是即时回忆还是延迟回忆,不准确的回忆在不同测试中都持续存在,且在即时回忆的不同测试中有所增加。我们认为,R项目在准确回忆方面的优势与它们在学习阶段比F项目接受了更多复述的观点一致。我们认为不准确的回忆反映出一种倾向,即在即时测试中,将缺乏指示标签而检索出的项目报告为F项目。在延迟测试中,缺乏指示标签而检索出的项目首先会根据记忆强度连续体上的一个标准点进行评估,强度高于该标准的项目被报告为R项目,低于该标准的项目被报告为F项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验