Suppr超能文献

硝酸镓与帕米膦酸盐用于急性控制癌症相关高钙血症的随机、双盲、II期试验。

Randomized, double-blind, phase II trial of gallium nitrate compared with pamidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia.

作者信息

Cvitkovic Frédérique, Armand Jean-Pierre, Tubiana-Hulin Michèle, Rossi Jean-François, Warrell Raymond P

机构信息

Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.

出版信息

Cancer J. 2006 Jan-Feb;12(1):47-53. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200601000-00009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both gallium nitrate and pamidronate are highly effective for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia. However, the proportion of patients who actually achieve normocalcemia has varied in published reports. Therefore, we conducted an exploratory, randomized, double-blind trial that compared the efficacy and safety of gallium nitrate and pamidronate in hospitalized patients with cancer-related hypercalcemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with hypercalcemia, defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium > or = 12.0 mg/dL after intravenous hydration, were stratified on the basis of tumor histology (i.e., epidermoid or nonepidermoid) and by study site. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive intravenous gallium nitrate 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 days or intravenous pamidronate 60 mg (increased during the study to 90 mg for patients with initial serum calcium > or = 13.5 mg/dL) followed by placebo infusions for 4 days. The primary endpoint of the study was comparison of the proportion of patients who achieved normocalcemia.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were randomized, and all patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Normocalcemia was achieved in 22 of 32 (69%) patients treated with gallium nitrate compared with 18 of 32 patients (56%) treated with pamidronate. Patients randomized to pamidronate with initial serum calcium > or = 13.5 mg/dL did not respond better to 90 mg (3 of 6; 50%) than to 60 mg (7 of 13; 54%), or compared with the response to gallium nitrate in this subset (15 of 21; 71%). Response to pamidronate was also lower in patients with epidermoid cancers (33%, vs 68% for gallium nitrate). Duration of normocalcemia was examined using both an intent-to-treat analysis irrespective of response and an analysis that examined only responding patients. By intent-to-treat analysis, the median duration of normocalcemia was 1 day for the pamidronate group and 7 days for the gallium nitrate group. Estimated normocalcemic duration in responders was 10 days for the pamidronate group and 14 days for the gallium nitrate group. Both drugs were well tolerated, and clinically significant nephrotoxicity was not observed in either treatment group.

DISCUSSION

Gallium nitrate appears to be at least as effective as pamidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia. Results from this trial suggest that gallium nitrate may be particularly useful in patients with epidermoid cancers or severe hypercalcemia at baseline, and in patients who have previously exhibited a poor response to bisphosphonates.

摘要

背景

硝酸镓和帕米膦酸盐对急性控制癌症相关高钙血症均非常有效。然而,在已发表的报告中,实际实现血钙正常的患者比例有所不同。因此,我们进行了一项探索性、随机、双盲试验,比较硝酸镓和帕米膦酸盐在住院癌症相关高钙血症患者中的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

符合条件的高钙血症患者,定义为静脉补液后经白蛋白校正的血清钙≥12.0mg/dL,根据肿瘤组织学(即表皮样或非表皮样)和研究地点进行分层。然后将患者随机分配接受静脉注射硝酸镓200mg/m²,每日1次,共5天,或静脉注射帕米膦酸盐60mg(在研究期间,初始血清钙≥13.5mg/dL的患者增加至90mg),随后静脉输注安慰剂4天。该研究的主要终点是比较实现血钙正常的患者比例。

结果

64例患者被随机分组,所有患者均进行了疗效和安全性评估。接受硝酸镓治疗的32例患者中有22例(69%)实现了血钙正常,而接受帕米膦酸盐治疗的32例患者中有18例(56%)实现了血钙正常。初始血清钙≥13.5mg/dL且随机分配接受帕米膦酸盐治疗的患者,接受90mg剂量时的反应(6例中的3例,50%)并不优于接受60mg剂量时的反应(13例中的7例,54%),也不如该亚组中接受硝酸镓治疗的反应(21例中的15例,71%)。表皮样癌患者对帕米膦酸盐的反应也较低(33%,而硝酸镓为68%)。使用无论反应如何的意向性分析以及仅检查有反应患者的分析来检查血钙正常的持续时间。在意向性分析中,帕米膦酸盐组血钙正常的中位持续时间为1天,硝酸镓组为7天。有反应患者中帕米膦酸盐组的估计血钙正常持续时间为10天,硝酸镓组为14天。两种药物耐受性均良好,且在任何一个治疗组中均未观察到具有临床意义的肾毒性。

讨论

硝酸镓在急性控制癌症相关高钙血症方面似乎至少与帕米膦酸盐一样有效。该试验结果表明,硝酸镓可能对基线时患有表皮样癌或严重高钙血症的患者,以及先前对双膦酸盐反应不佳的患者特别有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验