• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常任务中的注意力分散与行动失误:任务情境动态表征的证据

Distraction and action slips in an everyday task: evidence for a dynamic representation of task context.

作者信息

Botvinick Matthew M, Bylsma Lauren M

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6241, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1011-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03206436.

DOI:10.3758/bf03206436
PMID:16615321
Abstract

We report here a novel and counterintuitive effect of distraction on routine sequential action. The effect, predicted by a recent computational model of sequential behavior, relates to the tendency for a momentary distraction, such as a brief interruption, to lead to subsequent slips of action. The specific prediction is that errors should be more likely following a distraction occurring toward the middle of a subtask sequence than following a distraction occurring at the end of a subtask. This was tested and confirmed in an experiment involving repeated performance of an everyday task (coffee making) under conditions involving frequent interruption. The observed effect provides differential support for existing models of sequential behavior and offers a highly constraining benchmark for future theories.

摘要

我们在此报告分心对常规连续动作产生的一种新颖且有违直觉的效应。这种效应由近期的一种连续行为计算模型所预测,它与瞬间分心(比如短暂中断)导致后续动作失误的倾向有关。具体预测是,在子任务序列中间出现分心比在子任务末尾出现分心后,犯错的可能性更大。这一点在一项实验中得到了测试和证实,该实验要求在频繁中断的条件下反复执行一项日常任务(煮咖啡)。观察到的这种效应为现有的连续行为模型提供了不同的支持,并为未来的理论提供了一个极具限制性的基准。

相似文献

1
Distraction and action slips in an everyday task: evidence for a dynamic representation of task context.日常任务中的注意力分散与行动失误:任务情境动态表征的证据
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1011-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03206436.
2
Resisting distraction and response inhibition trigger similar enhancements of future performance.抵制干扰和反应抑制会引发未来表现的类似提升。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Oct;180:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Is deviance distraction immune to the prior sequential learning of stimuli and responses?偏差分散是否不受先前刺激和反应的序列学习影响?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Jun;27(3):490-497. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01717-8.
4
Action selection in complex routinized sequential behaviors.复杂例行顺序行为中的动作选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):955-75. doi: 10.1037/a0017608.
5
Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus-response sequence.区分听觉干扰和刺激-反应序列的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Mar;46(2):425-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00766.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
6
The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.跨通道Oddball任务中声音新奇性引起分心的认知位点。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):408-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.008. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
7
Happiness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.快乐会增加对听觉异常刺激的注意力分散。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):419-33. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12148. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
8
Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.协调用于过滤干扰信息的主动和反应机制:一项混合设计功能磁共振成像研究揭示的脑-行为关系
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):988-1000. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2966-15.2016.
9
Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.注意分散会降低编码时对分心的抵抗,但不会降低检索时的抵抗。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1268-1273. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1210-7.
10
The effect of interruptions on postcompletion and other procedural errors: an account based on the activation-based goal memory model.干扰对完成后及其他程序错误的影响:基于激活目标记忆模型的阐述
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Dec;14(4):314-28. doi: 10.1037/a0014397.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportune moments for task interruptions: examining the cognitive mechanisms underlying interruption-timing effects.任务中断的适当时机:探究中断时机效应背后的认知机制。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 15;15:1465323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1465323. eCollection 2024.
2
A theory of the skill-performance relationship.技能与表现关系的一种理论。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 9;15:1296014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296014. eCollection 2024.
3
C-SMB 2.0: Integrating over 25 years of motor sequencing research with the Discrete Sequence Production task.

本文引用的文献

1
Ideational apraxia and naturalistic action.意念性失用症与自然动作
Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Sep 1;15(6-8):617-43. doi: 10.1080/026432998381032.
2
Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities.争用调度和常规活动的控制。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Jun 1;17(4):297-338. doi: 10.1080/026432900380427.
3
Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action.无需模式层次结构:一种用于正常和受损常规序列动作的循环连接主义方法。
C-SMB 2.0:整合 25 年以上的运动序列研究与离散序列产生任务。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Jun;31(3):931-978. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02377-0. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Cognitive aging at work and in daily life-a narrative review on challenges due to age-related changes in central cognitive functions.工作和日常生活中的认知衰老——关于中枢认知功能随年龄变化所带来挑战的叙述性综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 9;14:1232344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232344. eCollection 2023.
5
On doing multi-act arithmetic: A multitrait-multimethod approach of performance dimensions in integrated multitasking.论多行为算术:综合多任务中绩效维度的多特质-多方法路径
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 18;13:946626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946626. eCollection 2022.
6
Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment.习惯养成中的情境稳定性可增强自动性并提高目标达成率。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:883795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883795. eCollection 2022.
7
Not all errors are alike: modulation of error-related neural responses in musical joint action.并非所有错误都相同:音乐共同动作中与错误相关的神经反应的调制。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 May 4;16(5):512-524. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab019.
8
The Impact of a Mnemonic Acronym on Learning and Performing a Procedural Task and Its Resilience Toward Interruptions.助记首字母缩写词对学习和执行程序性任务的影响及其对干扰的恢复能力。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 6;10:2522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02522. eCollection 2019.
9
Sequence Knowledge on and Supports Dual-Tasking.关于[具体内容未给出]和[具体内容未给出]的序列知识支持双重任务。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):18. doi: 10.5334/joc.76.
10
Action Errors: A Window Into the Early Development of Perception-Action System.动作错误:感知-动作系统早期发展的窗口。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2018;55:145-171. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2018.04.002.
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):395-429. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.395.
4
Representing task context: proposals based on a connectionist model of action.呈现任务情境:基于行动联结主义模型的提议。
Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):298-311. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0103-8. Epub 2002 Nov 7.
5
Event structure in perception and conception.感知与概念中的事件结构。
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):3-21. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3.