• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性中毒入院患者滥用药物的临床与实验室鉴定

Clinical vs. laboratory identification of drugs of abuse in patients admitted for acute poisoning.

作者信息

Bjornaas M A, Hovda K E, Mikalsen H, Andrew E, Rudberg N, Ekeberg O, Jacobsen D

机构信息

Department of Acute Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(2):127-34. doi: 10.1080/15563650500514384.

DOI:10.1080/15563650500514384
PMID:16615667
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The extent of drug abuse in patients admitted for self-poisonings is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of drugs of abuse among patients admitted for acute poisoning according to age and gender, and to study the concordance between the clinical assessments by the physicians on duty and the drug analyses.

METHODS

Prospective cross sectional study of all patients (n = 405, 52% males, median age 31 years) treated for acute poisoning in our department during one year (2001). The physician on-call classified type of drug of abuse by history and clinical assessment. This was later compared to urine and blood samples analysed for ethanol, benzodiazepines, opiates, cocaine, ecstasy, GHB, amphetamine and cannabis.

RESULTS

In 320 admissions (79%), the comparison between clinical diagnosis and laboratory analyses could be performed. A total of 478 drugs were suspected and 621 were found. The main toxic agents found were benzodiazepines (49.7%), ethanol (40.3%), opiates (35.3%), cannabis (23.8%) and amphetamine (21.3%). Ninety-two had used drugs of abuse. The agreement between clinical assessments and laboratory findings was best for GHB and ethanol (kappa = 0.43), and for opiates (k = 0.38). For benzodiazepines and cannabis, the concordance was poor (k = 0.18 and 0.10, respectively). However, the correct clinical evaluation for these substances was 59% and 77%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Drugs of abuse were more frequently found than suspected clinically. Benzodiazepines, ethanol and opiates were most common. The agreement between clinical assessment and drug analyses was moderate to low. Physicians seem to underestimate the use of these drugs.

摘要

目的

因自我中毒入院患者的药物滥用程度尚不确定。本研究的目的是根据年龄和性别评估急性中毒入院患者的药物滥用模式,并研究值班医生的临床评估与药物分析之间的一致性。

方法

对2001年在我科接受急性中毒治疗的所有患者(n = 405,52%为男性,中位年龄31岁)进行前瞻性横断面研究。值班医生通过病史和临床评估对药物滥用类型进行分类。随后将其与分析乙醇、苯二氮䓬类药物、阿片类药物、可卡因、摇头丸、γ-羟基丁酸、苯丙胺和大麻的尿液和血液样本进行比较。

结果

在320例入院病例(79%)中,可以进行临床诊断与实验室分析之间的比较。共怀疑478种药物,发现621种。发现的主要有毒物质为苯二氮䓬类药物(49.7%)、乙醇(40.3%)、阿片类药物(35.3%)、大麻(23.8%)和苯丙胺(21.3%)。92人曾滥用药物。临床评估与实验室检查结果之间的一致性在γ-羟基丁酸和乙醇方面最佳(kappa = 0.43),在阿片类药物方面也较好(k = 0.38)。对于苯二氮䓬类药物和大麻,一致性较差(分别为k = 0.18和0.10)。然而,对这些物质的正确临床评估分别为59%和77%。

结论

药物滥用的实际发现频率高于临床怀疑。苯二氮䓬类药物、乙醇和阿片类药物最为常见。临床评估与药物分析之间的一致性为中等至较低。医生似乎低估了这些药物的使用情况。

相似文献

1
Clinical vs. laboratory identification of drugs of abuse in patients admitted for acute poisoning.急性中毒入院患者滥用药物的临床与实验室鉴定
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(2):127-34. doi: 10.1080/15563650500514384.
2
Recent substance intake among patients admitted to acute psychiatric wards: physician's assessment and on-site urine testing compared with comprehensive laboratory analyses.最近急性精神病病房患者的物质摄入情况:医生评估与现场尿液检测与综合实验室分析比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;30(4):455-9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181e61923.
3
[Toxicological screening of medicines and drugs of abuse in emergency cases].[急诊病例中药物及滥用药物的毒理学筛查]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Jan 3;128(1):42-5.
4
[Structure of psychoactive substances determined in medical toxicology laboratory].
Przegl Lek. 2010;67(8):580-2.
5
Clinical assessment compared to laboratory screening in acutely poisoned patients.急性中毒患者临床评估与实验室筛查的比较
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Jan;27(1):73-9. doi: 10.1177/0960327107087800.
6
[Epidemiological analysis of cases with confirmed presence of amphetamine and THC in the material of Department of Analytical Toxicology and Drug Monitoring UJ CM].[雅盖隆大学医学院分析毒理学与药物监测系材料中苯丙胺和四氢大麻酚确诊病例的流行病学分析]
Przegl Lek. 2007;64(4-5):273-6.
7
Comparative assessment of blood and urine analyses in patients with acute poisonings by medical, narcotic substances and alcohol in clinical toxicology.
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(6):591-4.
8
Drugs detected in patients suspected of acute intoxication.在疑似急性中毒患者中检测到的药物。
Tex Med. 1997 Sep;93(9):50-8.
9
Intoxications by the dissociative new psychoactive substances diphenidine and methoxphenidine.二苯丁基哌啶和甲氧基苯丙胺所致精神活性物质中毒。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2015 Jun;53(5):446-53. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1033630. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
Toxicity evaluation of α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone (α-PVP): results from intoxication cases within the STRIDA project.α-吡咯烷戊酮(α-PVP)的毒性评估:STRIDA项目中毒案例的结果
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2016 Aug;54(7):568-75. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2016.1190979.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological and cost analysis of self-poisoning cases in ankara, Turkey.土耳其安卡拉自中毒病例的流行病学与成本分析。
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Nov 17;16(11):e10856. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.10856. eCollection 2014 Nov.
2
Estimating the prevalence of illicit opioid use in New York City using multiple data sources.利用多数据源估计纽约市非法阿片类药物使用的流行率。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 18;12:443. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-443.
3
Prescription use disorders in older adults.老年人的处方使用障碍。
Am J Addict. 2010 Nov-Dec;19(6):515-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00080.x. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
4
Suicidal intention, psychosocial factors and referral to further treatment: a one-year cross-sectional study of self-poisoning.自杀意念、心理社会因素与进一步治疗转介:一项自我中毒的为期一年的横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 26;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-58.