• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性中毒患者临床评估与实验室筛查的比较

Clinical assessment compared to laboratory screening in acutely poisoned patients.

作者信息

Heyerdahl F, Hovda K E, Bjornaas M A, Brørs O, Ekeberg O, Jacobsen D

机构信息

Department of Acute Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Jan;27(1):73-9. doi: 10.1177/0960327107087800.

DOI:10.1177/0960327107087800
PMID:18480152
Abstract

Acute poisonings may require identification of the toxic agents. It is impossible for routine laboratories to provide a full spectrum of toxicological analyses, and clinicians should know the reliability of the clinical diagnoses of toxic agents. We performed a 1-year study of hospitalized acute poisonings to determine the agreement between the clinical assessment on admission and serum laboratory tests for eight common toxic agents. Blood samples were drawn in 665 (70%) of the 947 admissions. The total number of laboratory found agents (967) exceeded the clinically suspected (871) by 11%. The agreement between the clinical assessment and laboratory analyses was good for ethanol and paracetamol (kappa = 0.70 for both), whereas only moderate or fair for other agents (kappa 0.22-0.51). Sensitivities of the clinical assessments compared to the laboratory results were better for common than rare agents, and better for higher than lower serum concentrations. The four most common agents (ethanol, benzodiazepines, paracetamol, and opiates) had overall sensitivity of 82% for higher-than-median serum concentrations, whereas the other agents had sensitivities ranging from 14% to 71% for higher-than-median concentrations. The reliability of the clinical diagnoses varied to such an extent that agents, which are important to recognize for specific treatment, should be tested for.

摘要

急性中毒可能需要识别有毒物质。常规实验室不可能提供全面的毒理学分析,临床医生应该了解对有毒物质进行临床诊断的可靠性。我们对住院急性中毒患者进行了为期1年的研究,以确定入院时的临床评估与针对8种常见有毒物质的血清实验室检测之间的一致性。在947例入院患者中,665例(70%)采集了血样。实验室检测出的有毒物质总数(967种)比临床怀疑的(871种)超出了11%。临床评估与实验室分析之间的一致性对于乙醇和对乙酰氨基酚而言良好(两者的kappa值均为0.70),而对于其他物质仅为中等或一般(kappa值为0.22 - 0.51)。与实验室结果相比,临床评估对常见物质的敏感性高于罕见物质,对血清浓度较高的物质的敏感性高于浓度较低的物质。四种最常见的物质(乙醇、苯二氮䓬类、对乙酰氨基酚和阿片类)对于高于中位数血清浓度的总体敏感性为82%,而其他物质对于高于中位数浓度的敏感性范围为14%至71%。临床诊断的可靠性差异很大,对于特定治疗而言重要的可识别物质应进行检测。

相似文献

1
Clinical assessment compared to laboratory screening in acutely poisoned patients.急性中毒患者临床评估与实验室筛查的比较
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Jan;27(1):73-9. doi: 10.1177/0960327107087800.
2
Recent substance intake among patients admitted to acute psychiatric wards: physician's assessment and on-site urine testing compared with comprehensive laboratory analyses.最近急性精神病病房患者的物质摄入情况:医生评估与现场尿液检测与综合实验室分析比较。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Aug;30(4):455-9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181e61923.
3
Clinical vs. laboratory identification of drugs of abuse in patients admitted for acute poisoning.急性中毒入院患者滥用药物的临床与实验室鉴定
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44(2):127-34. doi: 10.1080/15563650500514384.
4
[Comparison between the poisoning severity score and specific grading scales used at the Department of Clinical Toxicology in Krakow].[克拉科夫临床毒理学部使用的中毒严重程度评分与特定分级量表的比较]
Przegl Lek. 1999;56(6):401-8.
5
Nonconcordance between clinical impression and laboratory findings in clinical toxicology.
Clin Toxicol. 1977;10(4):417-22. doi: 10.3109/15563657709046277.
6
Comparative assessment of blood and urine analyses in patients with acute poisonings by medical, narcotic substances and alcohol in clinical toxicology.
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(6):591-4.
7
The availability of toxicological analyses for poisoned patients in Ireland.爱尔兰中毒患者的毒理学分析的可用性。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 May;48(4):373-9. doi: 10.3109/15563651003772938.
8
Reliability of self-reported use of amphetamine, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, methadone, and opiates among acutely hospitalized elderly medical patients.急性住院老年内科患者中自我报告的苯丙胺、巴比妥类药物、苯二氮䓬类药物、大麻素、可卡因、美沙酮和阿片类药物使用情况的可靠性。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008 Mar;46(3):239-42. doi: 10.1080/15563650701586397.
9
Acute adult poisoning cases admitted to a university hospital in Tabriz, Iran.伊朗大不里士一家大学医院收治的成人急性中毒病例。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2009 Apr;28(4):185-90. doi: 10.1177/0960327108099679.
10
[Toxicological screening of medicines and drugs of abuse in emergency cases].[急诊病例中药物及滥用药物的毒理学筛查]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Jan 3;128(1):42-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A nationwide Swedish retrospective study on poisoning deaths between the years 2000 and 2022.一项关于2000年至2022年间瑞典全国中毒死亡情况的回顾性研究。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Jan;136(1):e14097. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.14097. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Acute poisoning related to the recreational use of prescription drugs: an observational study from Oslo, Norway.与处方药娱乐性使用相关的急性中毒:来自挪威奥斯陆的一项观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0271-0.
3
Do pre-hospital poisoning deaths differ from in-hospital deaths? A retrospective analysis.
院前中毒死亡与院内死亡有差异吗?一项回顾性分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 May 8;25(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0391-z.
4
Five-year mortality after acute poisoning treated in ambulances, an emergency outpatient clinic and hospitals in Oslo.奥斯陆救护车、急诊门诊和医院治疗的急性中毒 5 年后死亡率。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013 Aug 21;21:65. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-65.
5
A one-year observational study of all hospitalized and fatal acute poisonings in Oslo: epidemiology, intention and follow-up.一项对奥斯陆所有住院和致命急性中毒的为期一年的观察性研究:流行病学、意图和随访。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 9;12:858. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-858.
6
A one-year observational study of all hospitalized acute poisonings in Oslo: complications, treatment and sequelae.一项针对奥斯陆所有住院急性中毒患者的为期一年的观察性研究:并发症、治疗和后遗症。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Jul 24;20:49. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-49.
7
Outpatient treatment of acute poisonings in Oslo: poisoning pattern, factors associated with hospitalization, and mortality.奥斯陆急性中毒的门诊治疗:中毒模式、与住院相关的因素和死亡率。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Jan 4;20:1. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-1.
8
Fatal poisonings in Oslo: a one-year observational study.奥斯陆致命中毒:一项为期一年的观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2010 Jun 6;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-10-13.