• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一份用于向照顾血液透析门诊患者的家庭医生和社区药剂师传递用药信息的传真文件。

Assessment of a fax document for transfer of medication information to family physicians and community pharmacists caring for hemodialysis outpatients.

作者信息

Riley Karen D, Wazny Lori D

机构信息

London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON.

出版信息

CANNT J. 2006 Jan-Mar;16(1):24-8.

PMID:16615703
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have clearly identified the outpatient dialysis population as one that is at high risk for drug-related problems. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a fax document was useful for community pharmacies and family physicians to notify these health care providers that their patient was receiving hemodialysis, to update medication and allergy records, provide dosing information on antibiotics and drugs to avoid, facilitate communication from the hemodialysis unit, and to decide if this was a worthwhile project to continue on an on-going basis.

METHODS

Fax documents were sent to community pharmacists and family physicians of 70 hemodialysis patients from two different hemodialysis satellite units. The fax document consisted of a brief cover letter with contact numbers, a copy of the patient's medication and allergy list, a table of appropriate antibiotic doses and medications to avoid in dialysis, and a survey to evaluate this project's usefulness. Fisher's exact test was used to determine whether there were any significant differences between the family physician and community pharmacist responses.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 37%. Ninety-five per cent (20/21) of family physicians and 81% (22/27) of community pharmacists who responded to the survey would use the medication profile to update their records. Ninety-five per cent of family physicians and 93% of community pharmacies thought the fax document was an improvement in communication from the dialysis unit. Ninety per cent of family physicians and 85% of community pharmacies thought that the fax document was a worthwhile project for the dialysis unit to continue. No significant differences were found between family physician and community pharmacist responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a fax document for the transfer of medication information to family physicians and community pharmacists caring for hemodialysis patients aids in updating medication and allergy profiles, improves communication fom the dialysis unit and is considered a worthwhile project to continue on an ongoing basis.

摘要

背景

研究已明确指出门诊透析人群是药物相关问题的高危人群。本研究的目的是评估一份传真文件对于社区药房和家庭医生而言是否有用,该文件用于通知这些医疗服务提供者其患者正在接受血液透析,以更新用药和过敏记录,提供抗生素给药信息及透析时应避免使用的药物信息,促进血液透析单位的沟通,并确定这是否是一个值得持续开展的项目。

方法

向来自两个不同血液透析卫星单位的70名血液透析患者的社区药剂师和家庭医生发送传真文件。传真文件包括一封附有联系电话的简短求职信、患者用药和过敏清单的副本、一份透析时适当抗生素剂量及应避免使用药物的表格,以及一项评估该项目实用性的调查。采用Fisher精确检验来确定家庭医生和社区药剂师的回复之间是否存在显著差异。

结果

调查回复率为37%。回复调查的家庭医生中有95%(20/21)和社区药剂师中有81%(22/27)会使用用药档案来更新他们的记录。95%的家庭医生和93%的社区药房认为传真文件改善了透析单位的沟通。90%的家庭医生和85%的社区药房认为传真文件对透析单位来说是一个值得继续开展的项目。家庭医生和社区药剂师的回复之间未发现显著差异。

结论

实施一份用于向照顾血液透析患者的家庭医生和社区药剂师传递用药信息的传真文件,有助于更新用药和过敏档案,改善透析单位的沟通,并且被认为是一个值得持续开展的项目。

相似文献

1
Assessment of a fax document for transfer of medication information to family physicians and community pharmacists caring for hemodialysis outpatients.评估一份用于向照顾血液透析门诊患者的家庭医生和社区药剂师传递用药信息的传真文件。
CANNT J. 2006 Jan-Mar;16(1):24-8.
2
Improving communication between hospital and community physicians. Feasibility study of a handwritten, faxed hospital discharge summary. Discharge Summary Study Group.改善医院医生与社区医生之间的沟通。手写、传真出院小结的可行性研究。出院小结研究小组。
Can Fam Physician. 1999 Dec;45:2893-9.
3
Extent of services provided by pharmacists in the Iowa Medicaid Pharmaceutical Case Management program.爱荷华医疗补助药品病例管理项目中药剂师提供服务的范围。
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2003 Jan-Feb;43(1):24-33.
4
Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists.处方相关信息的电子传输:比较患者、全科医生和药剂师的观点。
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar;53(488):204-9.
5
Do general practitioners and community pharmacists want information on the reasons for drug therapy changes implemented by secondary care?全科医生和社区药剂师是否想要了解二级医疗保健机构实施药物治疗变更的原因方面的信息?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Sep;47(422):563-6.
6
Performance of community pharmacists in providing clinical medication reviews.社区药剂师提供临床药物审查的表现。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Jul-Aug;44(7-8):1181-90. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M719. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
7
Physician-patient and pharmacist-patient communication: geriatrics' perceptions and opinions.医患及药剂师与患者的沟通:老年医学的认知与观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 May;71(2):265-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Evaluation of drug-related problems in an outpatient hemodialysis unit and the impact of a clinical pharmacist.门诊血液透析单元药物相关问题评估及临床药师的影响
Clin Nephrol. 1997 Feb;47(2):117-21.
9
New York State primary care physicians' attitudes to community pharmacists' clinical services.纽约州初级保健医生对社区药剂师临床服务的态度。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1437-41.
10
The EMITT study: development and evaluation of a medication information transfer tool.EMITT研究:一种药物信息传递工具的开发与评估
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;40(6):1074-81. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G707. Epub 2006 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication Reconciliation: The Foundation of Medication Safety for Patients Requiring Dialysis.药物重整:透析患者用药安全的基础。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Dec;76(6):868-876. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Enhancing collaborative pharmaceutical care for patients with chronic kidney disease: survey of community pharmacists.加强慢性肾脏病患者的协作药学服务:社区药师调查
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014 Jul;67(4):268-73. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v67i4.1370.
3
Evaluation of a training and communication-network nephrology program for community pharmacists.
针对社区药剂师的培训与沟通网络肾脏病学项目评估。
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Dec;30(6):924-33. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9253-0. Epub 2008 Sep 19.