Handler Johannes, Schönlieb Sabine, Hoppen Hans-Otto, Aurich Christine
Clinic for Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Andrology, Department of Animal Breeding and Reproduction, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Vienna, Austria.
Anim Reprod Sci. 2007 Feb;97(3-4):382-93. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.02.012. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
In the present study, we investigated the effects of reproductive status, size of follicles and plasma progesterone concentrations of mares at PRID insertion on the efficacy of the treatment, estrous cycle patterns, plasma concentrations of progesterone and LH. The progesterone-releasing device (PRID) was administered intravaginally to 28 Haflinger mares for 11 days at different reproductive stages: anestrus (n=6), estrus (n=11) and diestrus (n=11). Plasma concentrations of progesterone at insertion (Day 1) of PRID differed among treatment groups (anestrus: 0.2-0.6 ng mL(-1), estrus: 0.2-0.5 and diestrus: 1.6-10.8 ng mL(-1); P<0.001). Total secretion of progesterone (area under curve (AUC)) during treatment period revealed highest values in diestrus (38.2+/-3.1 ng mL(-1)h(-1)) followed by estrus (25.1+/-2.7) and anestrus (21.0+/-0.4 ng mL(-1)h(-1); P<0.05). Progesterone area under curve (AUC) was positively correlated with initial progesterone concentrations (R=0.5; P<0.05), but it did not correlate with the interval from PRID removal to ovulation. Plasma concentrations of LH during treatment period, were significantly lower in anestrous mares (184.6+/-28.6 ng mL(-1)h(-1)) when compared to estrous and diestrous mares (349.7+/-53.3 and 370.5+/-40.3 ng mL(-1)h(-1); P<0.05). Follicular size at PRID insertion had no effects on the intervals from PRID removal to subsequent estrus and ovulation. Follicle diameters at removal of PRID were significantly correlated with the interval from coil removal to estrus (R=-0.55, P<0.05) and ovulation (R=-0.72, P<0.0004) in cyclic mares. In anestrus 0 of 6 (0%) mares, in estrus 5 of 11 (45.5%) and in diestrus 6 of 11 (54.5%) mares ovulated within a defined interval of 1 day before to 1 day after mean interval from PRID removal to ovulation. In cyclic mares, response to treatment was significantly higher when compared to anestrous mares: almost all mares responded with estrus and ovulation independent from the stage of the estrous cycle at the start of treatment. However, accuracy of synchronization was still unsatisfactory. In cyclic mares, the plasma progesterone concentrations at insertion of PRID seem to be more important for the efficacy of the treatment than the assignment to estrous cycle stages.
在本研究中,我们调查了在插入孕酮释放装置(PRID)时母马的繁殖状态、卵泡大小和血浆孕酮浓度对治疗效果、发情周期模式、孕酮和促黄体生成素(LH)血浆浓度的影响。将PRID经阴道给予28匹哈福林格母马,在不同繁殖阶段持续11天:乏情期(n = 6)、发情期(n = 11)和间情期(n = 11)。PRID插入时(第1天)的血浆孕酮浓度在各治疗组间存在差异(乏情期:0.2 - 0.6 ng/mL,发情期:0.2 - 0.5 ng/mL,间情期:1.6 - 10.8 ng/mL;P < 0.001)。治疗期间孕酮的总分泌量(曲线下面积(AUC))显示,间情期最高(38.2±3.1 ng/mL·h⁻¹),其次是发情期(25.1±2.7)和乏情期(21.0±0.4 ng/mL·h⁻¹;P < 0.05)。孕酮曲线下面积(AUC)与初始孕酮浓度呈正相关(R = 0.5;P < 0.05),但与从PRID取出到排卵的间隔无关。治疗期间,乏情期母马的LH血浆浓度(184.6±28.6 ng/mL·h⁻¹)显著低于发情期和间情期母马(349.7±53.3和370.5±40.3 ng/mL·h⁻¹;P < 0.05)。PRID插入时的卵泡大小对从PRID取出到随后发情和排卵的间隔没有影响。在周期性发情的母马中,PRID取出时的卵泡直径与从取出到发情的间隔(R = -0.55,P < 0.05)和排卵的间隔(R = -0.72,P < 0.0004)显著相关。在乏情期,6匹母马中有0匹(0%)排卵;在发情期,11匹母马中有5匹(45.5%)排卵;在间情期,11匹母马中有6匹(54.5%)在从PRID取出到排卵的平均间隔前1天至后1天的规定间隔内排卵。在周期性发情的母马中,与乏情期母马相比,治疗反应显著更高:几乎所有母马都出现发情和排卵,与治疗开始时的发情周期阶段无关。然而,同步的准确性仍然不令人满意。在周期性发情的母马中,PRID插入时的血浆孕酮浓度对治疗效果似乎比发情周期阶段的划分更重要。