Suppr超能文献

一项针对戒烟的社会支持(“伙伴”)干预措施的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial of a social support ('buddy') intervention for smoking cessation.

作者信息

May Sylvia, West Robert, Hajek Peter, McEwen Andy, McRobbie Hayden

机构信息

Health Behaviour Unit, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.008. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of including a social support intervention ('buddy system') in a group treatment programme to aid smoking cessation.

METHODS

Five hundred and sixty-three smokers attended groups at a smokers' clinic. These groups were randomized either to be (a) groups in which smokers were paired with another person to provide mutual support (buddy condition: n=237 in 14 groups) or (b) to receive the same treatment without the buddy component (control: n=326 in 20 groups). Participants were seen weekly for the first 4 weeks after stopping then followed up again after 26 weeks.

RESULTS

Smokers in the buddy condition were no more likely than smokers in the control condition to stay abstinent at 1, 4 or 26 weeks. The effect was in the right direction at week one post-quit but after controlling for potential confounders the difference was not significant (odds ratio=1.45 (95% CI; 0.92-2.29), p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to show that a buddy system improved abstinence rates of group treatment programmes. This might be due to the high level of social support already achieved through the groups.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The buddy system is a simple and very low cost addition to a group treatment programme; but the results from this study suggest that the kind of buddy system tested may not add substantially to the success rates. However there may be merits in a more intensive or protracted form of buddying.

摘要

目的

评估在团体治疗项目中加入社会支持干预措施(“伙伴制度”)对帮助戒烟的有效性。

方法

563名吸烟者参加了一家戒烟诊所的团体治疗。这些团体被随机分为两组:(a)吸烟者与另一人配对以提供相互支持的组(伙伴组:14个组,共237人);(b)接受相同治疗但没有伙伴组成部分的组(对照组:20个组,共326人)。参与者在戒烟后的前4周每周接受一次检查,然后在26周后再次进行随访。

结果

在1周、4周或26周时,伙伴组的吸烟者与对照组的吸烟者相比,戒烟成功的可能性并无差异。在戒烟后第1周时效果朝着正确方向发展,但在控制潜在混杂因素后,差异并不显著(优势比 = 1.45(95%置信区间:0.92 - 2.29),p = 0.06)。

结论

我们无法证明伙伴制度能提高团体治疗项目的戒烟成功率。这可能是由于团体治疗已经提供了高水平的社会支持。

实践意义

伙伴制度是团体治疗项目中一种简单且成本极低的补充措施;但本研究结果表明,所测试的这种伙伴制度可能不会显著提高成功率。然而,更密集或更持久形式的伙伴关系可能有其优点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验