• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

戒烟方式的成本效益:这是在拿苹果和橙子作比较吗?

Cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation modalities: comparing apples with oranges?

作者信息

Mudde A N, de Vries H, Strecher V J

机构信息

Department of Health Education and Promotion, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):708-16. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0110.

DOI:10.1006/pmed.1996.0110
PMID:8936573
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the results of self-help and group treatments for smoking cessation are known, the cost effectiveness and participants' characteristics of these treatments remain mostly undetermined.

METHODS

Consecutive samples of 84 self-help manual requesters and 83 group participants in a Dutch community-based smoking cessation program were subjected to telephone interviews before treatment and after a 6-month follow-up. Participants' baseline characteristics were compared and contrasted with a random sample of nonparticipating smokers (N = 924). Cost effectiveness rates were computed from the perspectives of the society, the steering group, and the participants.

RESULTS

Participants appeared to be more "hardcore smokers" than nonparticipants. Self-help manual requesters seemed easier quitters than group participants. Self-help was at least three times as cost effective as group treatment from the perspective of the program provider and over four times as cost effective from the viewpoint of the participants. When taking savings through not smoking into account, return on the social investment was positive.

CONCLUSIONS

From a social perspective, the project seemed cost effective, compared with medical interventions. Since both modalities attracted different groups of smokers, cost effectiveness comparisons may incorporate the comparison of apples with oranges, and referral to either modality should be based on smokers' characteristics and the societal value placed on health as well.

摘要

背景

尽管自助戒烟和团体戒烟治疗的效果已为人所知,但这些治疗的成本效益以及参与者的特征大多仍未确定。

方法

对荷兰一项基于社区的戒烟项目中84名自助手册申请者和83名团体参与者的连续样本,在治疗前和6个月随访后进行电话访谈。将参与者的基线特征与未参与的吸烟者随机样本(N = 924)进行比较和对比。从社会、指导小组和参与者的角度计算成本效益率。

结果

与未参与者相比,参与者似乎更多是“重度吸烟者”。自助手册申请者似乎比团体参与者更容易戒烟。从项目提供者的角度来看,自助治疗的成本效益至少是团体治疗的三倍,从参与者的角度来看则超过四倍。如果将因不吸烟而节省的费用考虑在内,社会投资的回报是积极的。

结论

从社会角度来看,与医疗干预相比,该项目似乎具有成本效益。由于两种方式吸引的是不同群体的吸烟者,成本效益比较可能好比将苹果与橙子进行比较,而且转诊至任何一种方式都应基于吸烟者的特征以及社会对健康的重视程度。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation modalities: comparing apples with oranges?戒烟方式的成本效益:这是在拿苹果和橙子作比较吗?
Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):708-16. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0110.
2
Targeting smokers with low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials.针对戒烟意愿较低的吸烟者提供量身定制和非量身定制的自助材料。
Prev Med. 1999 Feb;28(2):203-11. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0407.
3
[Predictors of smoking cessation in group-based behavioral intervention programme--research findings in 2001-2007].[基于群体的行为干预项目中戒烟的预测因素——2001 - 2007年的研究结果]
Przegl Lek. 2008;65(10):634-40.
4
Do smokers know how to quit? Knowledge and perceived effectiveness of cessation assistance as predictors of cessation behaviour.吸烟者知道如何戒烟吗?作为戒烟行为预测因素的戒烟辅助知识及感知效果。
Addiction. 2004 Aug;99(8):1042-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00754.x.
5
Evaluating the effectiveness of a single telephone contact as an adjunct to a self-help intervention for smoking cessation in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,评估单次电话联系作为戒烟自助干预辅助手段的有效性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Jan;10(1):129-35. doi: 10.1080/14622200701767746.
6
A randomized trial to promote pharmacotherapy use and smoking cessation in a Medicaid population (United States).一项在美国医疗补助人群中促进药物治疗使用和戒烟的随机试验。
Cancer Causes Control. 2005 May;16(4):373-82. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-6573-9.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a family physician delivered smoking cessation program.家庭医生实施的戒烟计划的成本效益分析。
Prev Med. 2000 Dec;31(6):641-8. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0756.
8
[Group therapy and smoking cessation].[团体治疗与戒烟]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Sep 6;161(36):4987-8.
9
Smoking cessation in a blue-collar population: results from an evidence-based pilot program.蓝领人群中的戒烟:一项循证试点项目的结果
Am J Ind Med. 2002 Nov;42(5):367-77. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10129.
10
Randomized controlled trial of a social support ('buddy') intervention for smoking cessation.一项针对戒烟的社会支持(“伙伴”)干预措施的随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.008. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis.行为干预戒烟:综述和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 4;1(1):CD013229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2.
2
University-Based Smoking Cessation Program Through Pharmacist-Physician Initiative: An Economic Evaluation.通过药剂师-医生倡议开展的基于大学的戒烟项目:一项经济评估。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):LC11-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17641.7325. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
An economic evaluation of a video- and text-based computer-tailored intervention for smoking cessation: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
基于视频和文本的计算机定制戒烟干预的经济学评价:一项随机对照试验的成本效益和成本效用分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 13;9(10):e110117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110117. eCollection 2014.
4
A review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs.烟草控制项目的经济评估综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Jan;6(1):51-68. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6010051. Epub 2008 Dec 28.
5
Online advertising as a public health and recruitment tool: comparison of different media campaigns to increase demand for smoking cessation interventions.在线广告作为一种公共卫生和招募工具:不同媒体宣传活动对增加戒烟干预需求的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Dec 15;10(5):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1001.
6
Costs of the 'Hartslag Limburg' community heart health intervention.“哈特斯拉格林堡”社区心脏健康干预措施的成本。
BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar 2;6:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-51.
7
Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking.一个基于社区的帮助女性戒烟研究项目的成本效益
Tob Control. 2005 Feb;14(1):37-42. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005470.
8
A low-cost, practical method for increasing smokers' interest in smoking cessation programs.一种提高吸烟者对戒烟项目兴趣的低成本实用方法。
Can J Public Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;95(1):50-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03403634.
9
The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.临床实践指南中经济分析的应用有限。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Mar;17(3):210-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10522.x.
10
Guidance for commissioners on the cost effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions.戒烟干预措施成本效益专员指南。
Thorax. 1998 Dec;53 Suppl 5 Pt 2(Suppl 5):S1-38.