• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估重症监护患者死亡风险预测模型性能的方法:一项综述

Methods to assess performance of models estimating risk of death in intensive care patients: a review.

作者信息

Cook D A

机构信息

School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland and Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006 Apr;34(2):164-75. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0603400205.

DOI:10.1177/0310057X0603400205
PMID:16617636
Abstract

Models that estimate the probability of death of intensive care unit patients can be used to stratify patients according to the severity of their condition and to control for casemix and severity of illness. These models have been used for risk adjustment in quality monitoring, administration, management and research and as an aid to clinical decision making. Models such as the Mortality Prediction Model family, SAPS II, APACHE II, APACHE III and the organ system failure models provide estimates of the probability of in-hospital death of ICU patients. This review examines methods to assess the performance of these models. The key attributes of a model are discrimination (the accuracy of the ranking in order of probability of death) and calibration (the extent to which the model's prediction of probability of death reflects the true risk of death). These attributes should be assessed in existing models that predict the probability of patient mortality, and in any subsequent model that is developed for the purposes of estimating these probabilities. The literature contains a range of approaches for assessment which are reviewed and a survey of the methodologies used in studies of intensive care mortality models is presented. The systematic approach used by Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy provides a framework to incorporate these theoretical considerations of model assessment and recommendations are made for evaluation and presentation of the performance of models that estimate the probability of death of intensive care patients.

摘要

估计重症监护病房患者死亡概率的模型可用于根据患者病情严重程度进行分层,并控制病例组合和疾病严重程度。这些模型已用于质量监测、管理、运营和研究中的风险调整,并辅助临床决策。诸如死亡率预测模型家族、简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)以及器官系统衰竭模型等模型,可提供重症监护病房患者院内死亡概率的估计值。本综述探讨了评估这些模型性能的方法。模型的关键属性包括区分度(按死亡概率排序的准确性)和校准度(模型对死亡概率的预测反映真实死亡风险的程度)。应在预测患者死亡概率的现有模型以及后续为估计这些概率而开发的任何模型中评估这些属性。文献中包含一系列评估方法,本文对其进行了综述,并介绍了重症监护死亡率模型研究中使用的方法调查。《诊断准确性报告标准》所采用的系统方法提供了一个框架,以纳入这些模型评估的理论考量,并针对评估和呈现估计重症监护患者死亡概率模型的性能提出了建议。

相似文献

1
Methods to assess performance of models estimating risk of death in intensive care patients: a review.评估重症监护患者死亡风险预测模型性能的方法:一项综述
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006 Apr;34(2):164-75. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0603400205.
2
Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients. A systems update.重症监护病房患者疾病严重程度建模。系统更新。
JAMA. 1994 Oct 5;272(13):1049-55.
3
Illness severity scoring for Intensive Care at Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand: past and future.新西兰米德尔莫尔医院重症监护的疾病严重程度评分:过去与未来。
N Z Med J. 2010 Jun 11;123(1316):47-65.
4
External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study.英国南部SAPS II、APACHE II和APACHE III预后模型的外部验证:一项多中心研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1607-9. Epub 2003 Jan 18.
5
Severity of illness and organ failure assessment in adult intensive care units.成人重症监护病房的疾病严重程度和器官功能衰竭评估
Crit Care Clin. 2007 Jul;23(3):639-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2007.05.004.
6
Predictive mortality models are not like fine wine.预测性死亡模型不像美酒。
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):636-7. doi: 10.1186/cc3899. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
7
The impact of low-risk intensive care unit admissions on mortality probabilities by SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III.低风险重症监护病房入院对通过简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统III(APACHE III)得出的死亡概率的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2002 Jan;57(1):21-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02362.x.
8
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV:当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
9
The outcome of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE: model application, sensitivity, and predictability.根据RIFLE标准评估重症监护病房中急性肾衰竭的预后:模型应用、敏感性及可预测性
Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Dec;46(6):1038-48. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.08.033.
10
Prediction of mortality by using the standard scoring systems in a medical intensive care unit in Thailand.在泰国一家医疗重症监护病房中使用标准评分系统预测死亡率。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jul;88(7):949-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Trauma Mortality Prediction Models With Updated Survival Risk Ratios in Korea.韩国采用更新后的生存风险比率的创伤死亡率预测模型比较
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Apr 21;40(15):e51. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e51.
2
Consensus Statement on Electronic Health Predictive Analytics: A Guiding Framework to Address Challenges.电子健康预测分析共识声明:应对挑战的指导框架
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 7;4(1):1163. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1163. eCollection 2016.
3
An in-hospital mortality equation for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units.
重症监护病房机械通气患者院内死亡率方程。
J Anesth. 2013 Aug;27(4):541-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1557-0. Epub 2013 Mar 9.