• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者疾病严重程度建模。系统更新。

Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients. A systems update.

作者信息

Lemeshow S, Le Gall J R

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.

出版信息

JAMA. 1994 Oct 5;272(13):1049-55.

PMID:8089888
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review recent revisions of systems for estimating the probability of hospital mortality of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Emphasis on comparison of components of systems and potential uses.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles in which the systems were presented.

STUDY SELECTION

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE III), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), and Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) are the major severity systems for ICU patients.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information on variables collected in the systems, characteristics of databases from which they were developed, and reported performance of models were evaluated from published articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS

APACHE III and SAPS II produce a score and probability of hospital mortality based on worst values of several variables during the first 24 hours in ICU. The MPM II system has four models, one at ICU admission and one at 24, 48, and 72 hours into the ICU stay. The SAPS II and MPM II models can be implemented from published information. The APACHE III score can be calculated from published information; weights to convert score to probability are proprietary. All reported good areas under receiver operating characteristic curve. Goodness of fit was good for SAPS II and MPM II models and was not reported for APACHE III models.

CONCLUSIONS

All models were based on rigorous research and reported performance is good. All can be used to assist in assessing prognosis, to compare ICU performance, and to stratify patients for clinical trials. Direct comparison on a common cohort is needed.

摘要

目的

回顾成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者医院死亡概率评估系统的近期修订情况。重点比较各系统的组成部分及其潜在用途。

数据来源

介绍这些系统的已发表文章。

研究选择

急性生理与慢性健康状况评价系统(APACHE III)、简化急性生理评分系统(SAPS II)和死亡概率模型(MPM II)是ICU患者主要的病情严重程度评估系统。

数据提取

从已发表文章中评估各系统所收集变量的信息、开发这些系统所依据数据库的特征以及所报告的模型性能。

数据综合

APACHE III和SAPS II根据ICU最初24小时内几个变量的最差值得出一个分数及医院死亡概率。MPM II系统有四个模型,一个在ICU入院时,另外三个分别在入住ICU后的24、48和72小时。SAPS II和MPM II模型可根据已发表信息实施。APACHE III分数可根据已发表信息计算得出;将分数转换为概率的权重是专有的。所有模型在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积均显示良好。SAPS II和MPM II模型的拟合优度良好,APACHE III模型未报告拟合优度情况。

结论

所有模型均基于严谨研究,所报告的性能良好。所有模型均可用于协助评估预后、比较ICU的工作表现以及对患者进行分层以开展临床试验。需要在一个共同队列中进行直接比较。

相似文献

1
Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients. A systems update.重症监护病房患者疾病严重程度建模。系统更新。
JAMA. 1994 Oct 5;272(13):1049-55.
2
A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: results of a multicenter, multinational study. The European/North American Severity Study Group.重症监护病房患者疾病严重程度评分系统的比较:一项多中心、跨国研究的结果。欧洲/北美严重程度研究组。
Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;23(8):1327-35. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199508000-00005.
3
Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.对入住重症监护病房的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的六种死亡率预测模型的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2003 Oct;7(5):R116-22. doi: 10.1186/cc2373. Epub 2003 Aug 28.
4
[Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].[比较三种重症监护病房患者严重程度评分系统的性能:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)、简化急性生理学评分系统Ⅱ(SAPS II)、死亡率预测模型Ⅱ(MPM II)]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Aug;38(3):276-82.
5
Mortality prediction in head trauma patients: performance of Glasgow Coma Score and general severity systems.头部创伤患者的死亡率预测:格拉斯哥昏迷评分和一般严重程度系统的表现。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):142-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00030.
6
Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluations II and III and simplified acute physiology score II: a prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unit.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II和III与简化急性生理学评分II的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究,评估这些方法在德国跨学科重症监护病房中预测预后的情况。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;28(1):26-33. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00005.
7
Comparison of predictive accuracy among six prognosis prediction systems for patient mortality in intensive care units.六种重症监护病房患者死亡率预后预测系统的预测准确性比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2002 Jun;101(6):406-15.
8
Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database.在一个独立数据库上对两种结果预测模型进行评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):50-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00016.
9
Performance of six severity-of-illness scores in cancer patients requiring admission to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.六种疾病严重程度评分系统在需要入住重症监护病房的癌症患者中的表现:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R194-203. doi: 10.1186/cc2870. Epub 2004 May 24.
10
Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.第三代严重程度评分系统(APACHE IV、SAPS 3 和 MPM-III)在急性肾损伤危重症患者中的表现。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Dec;26(12):3894-901. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr201. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic performance of the IABP-SHOCK II Risk Score among cardiogenic shock subtypes in the critical care cardiology trials network registry.在重症监护心脏病试验网络登记处的心源性休克亚型中,IABP-SHOCK II风险评分的预后性能。
Am Heart J. 2024 Apr;270:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.12.018. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Prognostic Performance of the China Liver Cancer Staging System in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Transarterial Chemoembolization.中国肝癌分期系统在经动脉化疗栓塞术后肝细胞癌中的预后评估性能
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2023 Nov 28;11(6):1321-1328. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2023.00099. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
3
The Various Scoring Systems in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Observational Study.
儿科重症监护病房中的各种评分系统:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 30;15(5):e39679. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39679. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Using Second Measurement of De Ritis Ratio to Improve Mortality Prediction in Adult Trauma Patients in Intensive Care Unit.使用第二次德瑞蒂斯比值测量来改善重症监护病房成年创伤患者的死亡率预测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;12(12):2930. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122930.
5
Predicting medical events and ICU requirements using a multimodal multiobjective transformer network.使用多模态多目标变换网络预测医疗事件和 ICU 需求。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2022 Nov;247(22):1988-2002. doi: 10.1177/15353702221126559. Epub 2022 Oct 16.
6
Evaluation of the Potential Risk of Mortality from SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients According to the Charlson Comorbidity Index.根据查尔森合并症指数评估住院患者感染新型冠状病毒肺炎的潜在死亡风险
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;10(2):362. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020362.
7
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of mortality in intensive care unit patients: a retrospective analysis of the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III Database.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对重症监护病房患者死亡率的预测价值:对 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III 数据库的回顾性分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e053548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053548.
8
Development and validation of the food allergy severity score.食物过敏严重程度评分的制定与验证。
Allergy. 2022 May;77(5):1545-1558. doi: 10.1111/all.15165. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
Age as Maestro or Solo Instrument in Opera of Death.年龄在死亡之歌剧中是指挥大师还是独奏乐器。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun;25(6):606-607. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23868.
10
A Comparative Analysis of the Respiratory Subscore of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scoring System.序贯器官衰竭评估评分系统呼吸子项的对比分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Nov;18(11):1849-1860. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202004-399OC.