Davidson Andrew J
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Apr;16(4):374-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01877.x.
Advances in electroencephalogram (EEG) processing have produced new interest in measuring anesthesia using the EEG. There are a number of EEG-based anesthesia 'depth' monitors now available and their use in pediatric anesthesia is increasing. Although these monitors have been extensively studied in adults, there are relatively few studies examining their validity or use in children. To some extent we must rely on adult data. However, extrapolation of data from adults to children requires an in depth understanding of the physiology behind the data. The first question is what is being measured. What is anesthesia? A model of anesthesia has several components with arousal as a core component. Arousal can be linked to clinical observations, and correlates with anatomical and physiological studies. The EEG has characteristics that fairly consistently change with arousal during anesthesia, but the relationship between arousal and the EEG is imprecise and drug dependent. This relationship is the basis for using the EEG to measure anesthesia and provides only an indirect measure of consciousness and memory formation. A good understanding of how the EEG is related to anesthesia is essential when interpreting the EEG during anesthesia, and especially when extending the use of the EEG to measure anesthesia in children. Physiological studies in adults and children indicate that EEG-derived anesthesia depth monitors can provide an imprecise and drug-dependent measure of arousal. Although the outputs from these monitors do not closely represent any true physiological entity, they can be used as guides for anesthesia and in so doing have improved outcomes in adults. In older children the physiology, anatomy and clinical observations indicate the performance of the monitors may be similar to that in adults, although the clinical relevance of outcomes may be different. In infants their use cannot yet be supported in theory or in practice.
脑电图(EEG)处理技术的进步引发了人们对利用脑电图测量麻醉深度的新兴趣。现在有多种基于脑电图的麻醉“深度”监测仪可供使用,并且它们在小儿麻醉中的应用正在增加。尽管这些监测仪在成人中已得到广泛研究,但针对其在儿童中的有效性或应用的研究相对较少。在某种程度上,我们必须依赖成人数据。然而,将成人数据外推至儿童需要深入了解数据背后的生理学原理。第一个问题是正在测量的是什么。什么是麻醉?麻醉模型有几个组成部分,其中觉醒是核心组成部分。觉醒可以与临床观察相关联,并与解剖学和生理学研究相关。脑电图具有在麻醉期间随觉醒相当一致地变化的特征,但觉醒与脑电图之间的关系并不精确且依赖于药物。这种关系是利用脑电图测量麻醉的基础,并且仅提供对意识和记忆形成的间接测量。在解释麻醉期间的脑电图时,尤其是在将脑电图的应用扩展至测量儿童麻醉时,充分理解脑电图与麻醉的关系至关重要。成人和儿童的生理学研究表明,基于脑电图的麻醉深度监测仪可以提供对觉醒的不精确且依赖药物的测量。尽管这些监测仪的输出并不紧密代表任何真正的生理实体,但它们可以用作麻醉的指导,并且这样做已经改善了成人的麻醉效果。在大龄儿童中,生理学、解剖学和临床观察表明监测仪的性能可能与成人相似,尽管结果的临床相关性可能不同。在婴儿中,目前在理论和实践上都还无法支持其使用。